fcd4612f70bb22e11bf776c76afc45b03a5b026c
This happens because the scan times are very aggressive (to save power); and we don't find all APs on each scan. So on each scan, some APs are considered lost and some other are considered found; resulting in reordering the list. This change fixes that by requiring 3 scans to confirm absence of an AP. Bug: 7263326 Change-Id: I04f61ec5e5aa1589f457645acbf538c7e275a4bf
…
…
Description
No description provided
Languages
Java
73.7%
Kotlin
14%
PowerBuilder
5.8%
C++
5.2%
AIDL
1%