It was possible for a sync adapter without accounts access to
see the account which it is supposed to sync which can be used to
identify the user. This change ensures that only sync adapters
with account access can run (which results in seeing the account),
otherwise we involve the user to approve access only to this account.
A sync adapter can access an account if one of these is true:
- it is signed as the authenticator for this account
- has the GET_ACCOUNTS permission
- has an auth token for the account
- it is a preinstalled app (system or privileged)
The main thing we need to figure out is if the extra prompts
for giving access to a sync adapter to the account create too
much friction.
bug:28163381
Change-Id: Ie083bb681b5a2aed81ca5f6a062193a175fad77e
Some existing apps treat drawable visibility notifications as a signal
to crossfade from a placeholder to the new image for the purposes of
scrolling onscreen via a recycling collection view or similar. Since
dispatchVisibilityAggregated is now called for window visibility
changes and ImageView informs its drawable of the visiblity change,
the extra call triggers a repeat fade-in in some existing apps when
you return them to visibility.
These apps should pay attention to the second parameter of
Drawable#setVisible, which signals that animations should not restart
in response to a visibility change. Updating to targetSdkVersion=24+
will enable the new behavior.
Bug 30216207
Change-Id: I27ce9f09bc7544863f7f7980c273650949db21cc
Bug 30786309
If the Activity used in makeSceneTransitionAnimation isn't
the same one used in the startActivity call, a NullPointerException
could be thrown.
Change-Id: Id21c54fcf99b353feab62f7fc160997ed06e7d23
(cherry picked from commit 3289bfa289)
(cherry picked from commit a3edbf6a5d)
Verizon requires all SMS that starts with "//VZWVVM" to be treated
as a VVM SMS.
EXTRA_VOICEMAIL_SMS_MESSAGE_BODY is also added to VociemailContract
to send the message body of a SMS that matches the carrier regex but
is not parsable.
Bug: 30954955
Change-Id: Ib5449164a5290b132648cc28b1e1d3d9ddd5fea0
Bug 30786309
If the Activity used in makeSceneTransitionAnimation isn't
the same one used in the startActivity call, a NullPointerException
could be thrown.
Change-Id: Id21c54fcf99b353feab62f7fc160997ed06e7d23
(cherry picked from commit 3289bfa289)
If we return to the lockscreen from a FLAG_SHOW_WHEN_LOCKED activity,
there was an additional black flicker as the wallpaper wasn't shown
for a couple of frames. The issue is that we didn't set the wallpaper
flag again, to fix another flicker with lockscreen wallpapers. Now,
we pass the state whether we currently have a lockscreen wallpaper
and if we don't have one, we immediately set the wallpaper flag
again.
Bug: 30829255
Bug: 30883413
Change-Id: I9faeaa77b98eb02058171ce19cf90b43826ebe9e
Which for en_US would be something like "Friday August 5th 2016" but may
be re-ordered for other locales. Dates are hard.
Bug: 30682782
Change-Id: I015d293526592add27ce8fada12cd58bcc274ccf
First, we fix the transparent region computation to use the order as the
drawing. Previously, it is using the tree traverse order, not the draw order.
Second, add the y offset for any view with positive z value, this will allow
some space for shadow.
b/30124573
Change-Id: I98d38261ffd346b762651e087cb243e45fed6952
Bug: 30889568
Fixes an issue where mLayer didn't have
the mSurface set on it in certain resume
scenarios.
Change-Id: Ib75065d3d75e6141d6cd8f306584f6a569b9907c
This type behaves like a normal TYPE_APPLICATION, except that WM
will always wait for it to be drawn before starting a transition.
WM always waits for TYPE_BASE_APPLICATION (main window), but for
TYPE_APPLICATION, it only waits if the window relayouts to visible
and gets a surface before the main window is drawn. If main window
itself is ready very fast, transition could start without the other
window.
bug: 30830849
Change-Id: Ife71a9812db7c8eba6ee4ead10ce4f31d9e93b40
As discussed in ag/1192965/ we have a special case for rotation
animation selection in launch from double tap. This was set to
ROTATION_ANIMATION_CROSSFADE as the goal was just to avoid
ROTATION_ANIMATION_ROTATE on the viewfinder surface and
seamless rotation in launch scenarios was initially descoped. Now we
are aiming at fixing this though, and ROTATION_ANIMATION_CROSSFADE
does not quality for seamless rotation. ROTATION_ANIMATION_JUMPCUT
also would not be a good choice because in the situation that the
rotation occurs before the app starting window appears, then we would
jump cut from unrotated wallpaper to rotated app, I think we want
a crossfade in this scenario. To this end introduce and use a new @hide constant
ROTATION_ANIMATION_SEAMLESS which qualifies for seamless but falls back
to CROSSFADE if seamless can't occur.
Bug: 30171992
Change-Id: If1945b17b5159be4cd5ba0b139d6bea9f7fcca33
The summary is supposed to just hold enough data to continue counting
once the device has reset. Since kernel stats reset when the device
resets, and the first update is ignored to account for soft resets where the
kernel continues running, SamplingTimer should not be recording the last value
it saw from /proc/wakelocks in the summary.
Bug:30575302
Change-Id: Ic193bc5af9a0ede514e3abc8146523d7316c47d3
In Android N, View#isTemporarilyDetached() returns true if it is called
when the same View instance is handling View#onFinishTemporaryDetach().
Returning true there is, however, sometimes confusing, especially
scenarios like the following case:
@Override
public void onFinishTemporaryDetach() {
doSomeRestoringWorks();
}
private void doSomeRestoringWorks() {
doSomething();
}
private doSomething() {
if (isTemporarilyDetached()) {
// As of N, we hit here if this is called as a result of
// View#onFinishTemporaryDetach().
} else {
// but is the logic here is more likely to be appropriate
// when handling View#onFinishTemporaryDetach()?
}
}
What this CL aims to do is to let View#isTemporarilyDetached() return
false when it is called while handling View#onFinishTemporaryDetach(),
because it should make View#onFinishTemporaryDetach() more useful.
Regarding the app compatibility, View#isTemporarilyDetached() was added
in API 24 hence the impact on this change is still limited.
Bug: 30791718
Change-Id: If384da9f9e6ff849598896901626fd021bae5cda
