Fix handling of RelativeLayout measurement using UNSPECIFIED spec

Bug: 22613599
Change-Id: Ibdac9de1d5b53a46b29ae916e5dcc8b5c4bc9c27
This commit is contained in:
Alan Viverette
2015-07-22 15:37:14 -04:00
parent b73946715c
commit 5b39ec8b40

View File

@@ -731,7 +731,8 @@ public class RelativeLayout extends ViewGroup {
// Negative values in a mySize value in RelativeLayout
// measurement is code for, "we got an unspecified mode in the
// RelativeLayout's measure spec."
if (mySize < 0 && !mAllowBrokenMeasureSpecs) {
final boolean isUnspecified = mySize < 0;
if (isUnspecified && !mAllowBrokenMeasureSpecs) {
if (childStart != VALUE_NOT_SET && childEnd != VALUE_NOT_SET) {
// Constraints fixed both edges, so child has an exact size.
childSpecSize = Math.max(0, childEnd - childStart);
@@ -767,7 +768,7 @@ public class RelativeLayout extends ViewGroup {
if (childStart != VALUE_NOT_SET && childEnd != VALUE_NOT_SET) {
// Constraints fixed both edges, so child must be an exact size.
childSpecMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
childSpecMode = isUnspecified ? MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED : MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
childSpecSize = Math.max(0, maxAvailable);
} else {
if (childSize >= 0) {
@@ -784,7 +785,7 @@ public class RelativeLayout extends ViewGroup {
} else if (childSize == LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT) {
// Child wanted to be as big as possible. Give all available
// space.
childSpecMode = MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
childSpecMode = isUnspecified ? MeasureSpec.UNSPECIFIED : MeasureSpec.EXACTLY;
childSpecSize = Math.max(0, maxAvailable);
} else if (childSize == LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT) {
// Child wants to wrap content. Use AT_MOST to communicate