Report EditorInfo#packageName based on the actual uid.

This is a follow up CL for Ib871141e3381e45c2623c5f4d692da7a7e78fcc5,
which introduced a verification mechanism between the applicaiton uid
and EditorInfo#packageName reported from the application by using
AppOpsManager#checkPackage.

Regression Bug 21408239 caused by above change is really similar to
the situation we saw in Bug 10688644.  As well explained in the CL
description of Ic04f77b3938585b02fccabbc12d2f0dc62b9ef25, the
system has a special ability to run in the processes of other uids.
Hence we need to use Context#getOpPackageName() instead of
Context#getPackageName() in case components declared by the system
is loaded into another process.

Bug: 18931038
Bug: 21408239
Change-Id: I78510a2ea6ac06cfd5813a23c42f09f70c468493
This commit is contained in:
Yohei Yukawa
2015-06-03 15:58:59 -07:00
parent c52e0d900c
commit 02df328f0c

View File

@@ -1169,7 +1169,10 @@ public final class InputMethodManager {
// do its stuff.
// Life is good: let's hook everything up!
EditorInfo tba = new EditorInfo();
tba.packageName = view.getContext().getPackageName();
// Note: Use Context#getOpPackageName() rather than Context#getPackageName() so that the
// system can verify the consistency between the uid of this process and package name passed
// from here. See comment of Context#getOpPackageName() for details.
tba.packageName = view.getContext().getOpPackageName();
tba.fieldId = view.getId();
InputConnection ic = view.onCreateInputConnection(tba);
if (DEBUG) Log.v(TAG, "Starting input: tba=" + tba + " ic=" + ic);