Before this change these actions were hidden.
After this change, they are displayed but disabled which makes it more intuitive.
Bug: 336762423
Test: atest UserSettingsTest && atest UserDetailsSettingsTest
Flag: android.multiuser.new_multiuser_settings_ux
Change-Id: Ie07816b7d3817d12e78e1ec2692fcddea9328933
Before, when the restrictions were applied, the preferences that were restricted were hidden.
After this change, if admin applies a restriction, the preference is displayed as disabled and Policy Transparency Dialog is displayed
Bug: 338226475
Test: atest UserSettingsTest && atest UserDetailsSettingsTest
Flag: android.multiuser.new_multiuser_settings_ux
Change-Id: I1b5aeeeec7accde278ff3e46ea3d64c91d8400db
The name "Allow multiple users" is too ambiguous. It sounds like by toggling it off, the feature is completely disabled. In fact, it only hides user switcher. In conjunction with hiding other users from the list, it makes it appear as all the users get deleted when the toggle is off. On the contrary, users might be running in background when the toggle is off.
After this change, the new name better represents the intention behind this toggle, as well as makes the UI more intuitive. The users are not being hidden anymore. But switching preference gets disabled.
Since the toggle can only be enabled or disabled by owner (after this refactoring), it means that Owner has full control over multiuser settings and is able to perform actions on users without having to enable the toggle.
Bug: 336762423
Test: atest UserSettingsTest && atest UserDetailsSettingsTest
Flag: android.multiuser.new_multiuser_settings_ux
Change-Id: Id9d507039b58d3df66fe78710409716fd4816890
Before this change, Delete action was disabled for all uninitialized secondary users.
Bug: 341840847
Test: atest UserDetailsSettingsTest
Change-Id: Icd43836f577dd061d267f6fb75658c35a0c47589
Only let main user (Owner) change state of the toggle
Bug: 336764498
Test: atest MultiUserSwitchBarControllerTest
Change-Id: Ib694d1cb4685764c64633efc090765b470a0a015
Currently, if Settings applies CALLS or SMS restrictions to a user, that
restriction doesn't propogate to its child profiles. It should.
This is actually a no-op right now, since it's not possible to have a
profile on a user that isn't the Admin user anyway. But one day such a
thing may be allowed, so this implementation is more future-proof and
safer.
Test: Manual verification that applying the restriction continues to
work properly a full user
Test: UserDetailsSettingsTest
Bug: 261469887
Change-Id: Ib19cecbd37b6efc90f9655565295e7856427f049
Send information to avatar sync service that user selected confirm or cancel on edit user info dialog
Bug: 320656026
Test: manual
Change-Id: I84356b844d47ea7c07f662691f1e48eaca56b7d8
Revert submission 25262217-fix_mu_for_cope
Reason for revert: This issue requires a different approach to the solution.
Reverted changes: /q/submissionid:25262217-fix_mu_for_cope
Change-Id: Ic6e8afd76cb0af88612cf5a6cd34a0c7f50759c4
When multi-user feature not supported in framework, SettingsIntelligence should not build the index of multiple users for searching.
Return empty list when multi-user feature not supported during building search index.
Change-Id: Id2fb8f2066784d63bbfd5c396da88b04306a3563
Bug: 310108420
Bug: 304359233
Test: set up device in COPE mode and check toggle in Settings -> System -> Multiple Users
Change-Id: I0edd58651f94c9f9a51349025a29e33a1e1a9c14
Switch and SwitchCompat are both CompoundButton.
Using CompoundButton in Java will helps migration in the future.
Bug: 306658427
Test: manual - on affected pages
Change-Id: I7cdc2601879a85d33f77239e38263320d5a6984e
SwitchPreference and SwitchPreferenceCompat are both TwoStatePreference.
Using TwoStatePreference in Java will helps migration in the future.
Bug: 306771414
Test: manual - check Settings pages
Change-Id: I84e1d7b09451106797c2b23d127855c6976678ca
Revert submission 24420426-multi_toggle
Reason for revert: This change needs to be done along with some other UI changes to avoid confusion
Reverted changes: /q/submissionid:24420426-multi_toggle
Change-Id: Ife2e03d0090fefcb4c1fa53dd007336759eb1bc7
It makes more sense to have the toggle as on permanently as long as there are other users on the device. Otherwise if we toggle off "Allow multiple users", other users get hidden. Also with current behaviour the any admin can switch the toggle and this can block any other user, including main, from being able to use the device.
Bug: 295183792
Test: atest MultiUserSwitchBarControllerTest && UserSettingsTest
Change-Id: I8cb0671d780f45c17a9bb7c9a9d3b108128ead9d
Admins should not be able to disable phone calls and SMS from the device owner.
Bug: 294846327
Test: atest UserDetailsSettingsTest
Change-Id: Ibb8532379c6e1e22fe45f2acb5191f8f6c7f3b0a
When dialog for creating user was dismissed with keyboard being displayed, the keyboard stayed on the screen and could not be released due to incorrect list of methods called on dialog dismissal. This CL topic fixes onDismiss() behaviour of this dialog. Videos of current behaviour and behaviour after fixed are attached to the bug.
Bug: 291865725
Test: atest UserSettingsTest
Change-Id: Ib3ade3de9228c8ba24e7ac2e235aaeec45efbe4e
In Setting, after deleting or exiting the guest user, or failure to
reset the guest user involves switching back to user0, which is not
possible with HSUM (headless system user mode). With this CL we're
now switching back to previous foreground user instead of system user.
Bug: 283106632
Test: manual
Change-Id: Id60063cca75d9fded7dfe0b7d7a4b871d67c4b0c
Bug: 287265141
Test: on device with multiple admins enabled (default for HSUM) create a new
user and open User details view. Toggle Make this user an admin on/off.
Observe increased padding.
Change-Id: I216a91c4685eb12986cc4c61ae7be439358f55b2
Do not show the "timeout to admin user" settings preference when user
switching is blocked on the current user, e.g. in demo mode.
Test: atest SettingsRoboTests:TimeoutToDockUserPreferenceControllerTest
Bug: 255277938
Change-Id: Ibd0944c69254000a453f477eb72a0ba5832e9793