In the class description, fixed the reference link that points to the
Fragments guide.
Bug: 29007808
Change-Id: I3399e5f10c461eb6666a04f8829c6cde774948e0
Added a bit more information in the javadocs about the new constant
ENCRYPTION_STATUS_ACTIVE_PER_USER in related methods/constants so
that developers don't miss checking for that constant when targeting
API Level 24.
Change-Id: Id9cd6248637fe0fc28d5161344abe02614b5f502
Fixes: 30073719
Fixes a case where notification header text could go missing
if a notification view was recycled and previously had a header text.
Reapplying only hid the text without clearing it, so the extraction
logic thought it was still there and hid the text for the children
even though it was not showing for the parent.
Change-Id: I3f96e1e7bebb2f815020d278ad13b2b5d948e63c
Fixes: 29915184
In extreme cases the list of recent tasks can grow beyond the size
of a single Binder transaction. This change moves over to
ParceledListSlice which handles chunking any large results.
Bug: 29635557
Change-Id: Iaf1227234f5f8c9451f73a6a5c1dc89f2067f05f
Since all pending intents are stored on a Set in the Notication object,
there is no need to individually check for specific pending intents.
BUG: 29480440
Change-Id: I27a18bb535a9a4bb6cb4e76bdc189e6c315a684a
We need to make every peniding intent that went in the notification
system to allow special handling of such intents when fired by a
notification listener. If a pending intent from a notification
is sent from a notification listener, we white-list the source app
to run in data saver mode for a short period of time. The problem is
that actions and the notificaion can have extras which bundles may
contain pending intents but the system cannot look into the bundles
as they may contain custom parcelable objects. To address this we
keep a list of all pending intents in the notification allowing
the system to access them without touching the bundle. Currently
the pending intents are written to the parcel twice, once in the
bundle and once as the explicit list. We can come up with a scheme
to optimize this but since pending itents are just a binder pointer
it is not worth the excecise.
bug:29480440
Change-Id: I7328a47017ca226117adf7054900836619f5679b
Previously the DisplayMetrics passed to a new ResourcesImpl
object would be generated from the default DisplayAdjustments.
We now use the correct DisplayAdjustments for the ResourcesImpl
and make sure to update them for things like rotation changes.
Bug:29619314
Change-Id: If2ba0d7670a4554dcd3fde9766e2337f20a191fd
(cherry picked from commit 8e8d23214a)
When an app is being uninstalled for a specific user, only kill the
app under that user; leave the app running under other users.
Bug: 28875343
Change-Id: Ie60753cfd22df10a2b17d8c3732b6f19d2fe1fb9
I really have no idea how this can be happening (we check
for a null intent before posting the args), but add another
check before dispatching to try to avoid it.
Change-Id: Ic704850c9750b6a078c49ea628189be568031086
Make sure that when our Resources get updated, that DisplayAdjustment
and Display properly reflect the potentially new screen dimensions.
Bug:28388969
Change-Id: I340550ea094ece87abc8790dd46aaa60ab3cedd3
