Rotation lock does not override NOSENSOR mode anymore.
Centralize the rotation policy settings into a new class shared by
the System UI and Settings applications.
Add a new setting to specify whether rotation-lock is being hidden
because the "auto-rotate screen" option has been toggled in the
Accessibility settings panel.
Bug: 6523269
Change-Id: I15173280d25bc5d101e89a9c65913aefc53fc33a
1. Now after setting the content description on a view we mark is as
important for accessibility of the current important for accessibility
mode of that view is auto.
2. Minor tweak to a touch explorer coefficient to make performing double
tapping easier.
bug:6615353
Change-Id: I3b477f533a3ebde85d425caf32ace5e851240f88
...active SuggestFragment{419494f0} has cleared index: -1
There were issues when the same fragment was removed and then
added again before completely finishing the remove (such as due
to a running animation).
Two fixes:
- Now when you call FragmentTransaction.replace() and are replacing
a fragment with the same fragment, this becomes a no-op, to avoid
visual artifacts in the transition and bad states.
- When we are moving the fragment state up and it is currently
animating away to the INITIALIZED state, we could end up making
the fragment inactive as part of the cleanup. In this case it
shouldn't be made inactive; we just need to initialize it but
keep it active since we are going to continue to use it.
Bug: 6584942
Change-Id: I8bfd73f2d8ef8f67b541b3e2525dfa5db6c3bfa5
Alpha values were being set correctly on native Display Lists during an
AlphaAnimation, but not when the animation finished. Only non-1 values
were being propagated to the Display List properties.
The fix is to track when we've set a non-1 alpha value from an AlphaAnimation
and to notice that flag when the value is 1 (because the animation ended), so that
we propagate that value correctly. Using the flag avoids sending a value of 1
(by far the most common case) unless we really need to restore it after animating
it with non-1 values.
Issue #6600592 Sometimes album art blends with list asset on queue
Change-Id: I51047d756a4ac42a2d907a4d77963cc23dfb1db3
1. One of the loops was using the last visible position
as its end boundary as opposed to the child count
minus one.
bug:6610451
Change-Id: I600545ca3f64d1e982f909f893e5d34570ec5c8b
1. Currently accessibility focus removal was clearing the selection
in the view - in particular the accessibility cursor position
which in the TextView case is the selection. This leads to a
scenario where the selection may be cleared when the app does
not explect. Further, the selection should not be cleared
since the user can be say several pages in the content and
removing and putting back accessibility focus would cause a
tedious traversal to get to the previous position.
bug:6469840
Change-Id: Iba3c01600fa2c9c39f99085a5fbc4328aa539ea8
1. If an accessibility service uses an invalid focus type argument
when trying to find where focus is the queried application crashes.
The same happens if the serivce calls focus search with an invalid
derection. While we need the argument check in the controller that
runs in the app process the accessibility service has to be the
palace where an exception is thown for the invalid argument so
the developer can fix his code.:
bug:6508797
Change-Id: Ib0d74f374fa60ee8fd6117f11c23af34f6c26ad3
1. The focus search algorithm considers only visible
views, specifically when adding focusables. Since
AbsListView implements a custom focus search strategy
for better user experience it also has to return
only views that are visible.
bug:6543878
Change-Id: I6207c29402e4ac6190c1e65d042e04449aa75ef8
This change is very useful for testing purposes because it makes it
easy to compare different implementations to see how they behave.
There is no change to the current default strategy.
Bug: 6413587
Change-Id: I4d8567aa4160571ba9fa397ce419882cd9366749
1. The clearFocus routine in ViewGroup was clearing the pointer
to the descendant which has focus after calling clear focus
on that child. However, currently clearing the focus of a view
causes the view that loses focus to try to give the focus to
the first focusable which potentially sets the pointer to the
child that has input focus in the ViewGroup but the ViewGruop
essentially clears that pointer. This resulted in having two
focused views at the same time in some cases.
2. AbsListView was not calling the super implementation of add
focusables if the focus type was not accessibility.
bug:6559819
Change-Id: I478dfed000b5de3f9b15e12eb82aa3d34c2301e4
