This change also fixes a race condition. If multiple UI threads are used
in a single process, RelativeLayouts could end up using the same nodes
in different windows, causing mayhem and headaches.
Change-Id: I9ba4a0bf05d44e1a1e7a82443d40c500c657cd7a
The calendar view was updating its header only if the focused
month changes. Removed the check whether the displayed month
changed before setting it since the setter is carefully called
only in cases when there is a change. Hence, now if the year
or the month change, we update the header. This is the safest
and least intrusive fix.
bug:9167305
Change-Id: I98200bb57580f6416abd30c6c25454d4474add64
Enhance Toast to support new standard toast bar style, similar
to the undo bar in Gmail. Toast bars can be interactive,
and can have a single action. Add a new toast duration to
indicate persistent toasts (no auto-hide delay).
Use the new toast bar to implement a feature hint when hiding
the navigation bar in hideybars mode.
Per UX, the feature confirmation bar can also be dismissed on
any outside touch as long as the user confirmed it using the
OK button at least once globally.
Bug: 8754108
Change-Id: Iaa85d3b4da7ada1952a562f1e31de04380f5d587
This is a new kind of key/value mapping that stores its data
as an array, so it doesn't need to create an extra Entry object
for every mapping placed in to it. It is also optimized to reduce
memory overhead in other ways, by keeping the base object small,
being fairly aggressive about keeping the array data structures
small, etc.
There are some unit and performance tests dropped in to some
random places; they will need to be put somewhere else once I
decided what we are going to do with this for the next release
(for example if we make it public the unit tests should go in
to CTS).
Switch IntentResolver to using ArrayMap instead of HashMap.
Also get rid of a bunch of duplicate implementations of binarySearch,
and add an optimization to the various sparse arrays where you can
supply an explicit 0 capacity to prevent it from doing an initial
array allocation; use this new optimization in a few places where it
makes sense.
Change-Id: I01ef2764680f8ae49938e2a2ed40dc01606a056b
The node bounds populated by the child TextView were not consistent
with the bounds manually populated for its parent NumberPicker.
Bug: 9072003
Change-Id: Icbfa64f52cf11fd39c7243936227b8ba36280c3c
The node bounds populated by the child TextView were not consistent
with the bounds manually populated for its parent NumberPicker.
Bug: 9072003
Change-Id: Icbfa64f52cf11fd39c7243936227b8ba36280c3c
In case of a ListView has a item which takes more than 33% of its height
(result from getMaxScrollAmount), scroll does not move enough to show
all the item. In this case, consecutive arrow scroll moves selection
everytime while scroll may not move that much.
This fixes the issue by checking the visibility of current selection in
advance.
Bug: 8831751
Change-Id: Ic747bd5513c6734aaf1a1d08e497c1e3ef835004
We are prefetching accessibility node infos to minimize the number of IPC
calls when an accessibility service introspects the screen. It is however,
possible that the view we are prefetching is a child of an AbsListView whose
adapter changed its data but the AbsListView still did not perform a layout
pass to sync its children with the new adapter state. This may lead to an
exeption when trying to query for the state of a child's position. If the
data of the adapter is changed and the layout pass still not performed,
we return null for the AbsLIstView's children. When the layout pass
completes we already notify the accessibliity layer so it will be able to
refetch the children of the AbsListView.
bug:8433433
Change-Id: I56313c721aef3848b15fad50027d068ba1d291f7
- add missing assignment for text direction (mTextDir)
- when layout direction change, update text direction (mTextDir again)
Change-Id: Id600fb0c5897a0d2ee5f9fe18a63437dc3e528d9
We added APIs to allow an accessibility service to extend the
selection while moving the cursor at a given granularity such
as word, character, etc. The problem is that the traversal was
extending only the end of the selection while moving forward
and the start of the selection while moving backward. This leads
to a case in which the user cannot shrink/extend the selection
because for example instead of shrinking the end of the selection
the implementation was extending the start.
Now extending the selection moves only the selection end. This is
the same behavior as text view using a keyboard.
Tests: https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/307062
bug:8839844
Change-Id: Id6965b102647df909f61301fcc8ec05458dd5881
This lets apps get the audio session id of the video being played, so
they can apply effects to the audio track.
b/8767565
Change-Id: Iaa39d97d0b6fb528ed04b52d579afa58444ebcfe
AbsListView is backed by an adapter. After the adapter data changes
the view sets a flag that its state is dirty and requests a layout.
If an accessibility service asks for the state of a list item at
this point, it may incur an error since the views and the adapter
are not in sync.
Now if an accessibility service queries for a list item when the
data set is changed and the item views are dirty, we pretend the
children do not exist. After the layout happens, we notify the
accessibility layer that the screen content changed so it can
refetch the views if desired (this notification mechanism is
already in place in AbsListView#handleDataChanged()).
bug:8433433
Change-Id: I4287a0ac2ef6bb33f1f988d5ddad973556c305ca
Basic implementation of an undo manager. Supports
multi-level undo/redo, building on the top undo state
as edits occur, managing multiple distinct entities in
the undo state (such as embedded objects in a document),
and saving/restoring the full undo state. Still some
work remaining on correctly dealing with dependencies
between undo states that hold multiple owners.
Also do a simple implementation of undo state in TextView
to see how things actually work. The implementation here
is very primitive: it needs a lot more work to correctly
identify when to merge undo ops, is not trying to do
anything smart with style spans, etc.
Change-Id: Ie30f4e133351e2f569ffb48c6c44a2b19cadee27
Before, we'd have something like 2006 4月12. After, we have 2006 4 12.
The alternative would require using custom NumberPicker.Formatter instances
for the year and day fields in these locales, and that seems significantly
more disruptive.
Bug: 8766552
Change-Id: I568578aae2f80f2acfc53cd277ef3beae6743472
