The BoringLayout measurements for auto-size are
incorrect. Removed those and kept the StaticLayout
measurements.
Bug: 36940118
Test: cts-tradefed run cts-dev -m CtsWidgetTestCases -t\
android.widget.cts.TextViewTest
Change-Id: I772ade08ed26efac05ca56cb7df8cfec0327633b
WebView safebrowsing can be opted in using a manifest value. However,
we also need to control individual WebViews.
Bug:37158813
Test: See change I71e813bccc2fab73d100384661128c7311dd396c
Change-Id: I647dc304787d6406691b5cbadf1c9a4f13ac5604
Also:
- Give the session an integer ID as the activityToken is not stable over
restarts of the activity
- Verify that session is only accessed by one UID
- stabilize AccessibilityViewIds over activity lifecycle at least for
the IDs we can do that. This required to split the ID namespace in
"per-app" and "per-activity" views. Only the later ones can be
restored.
- Do not end session when app is killed (as it can be restarted)
Bug: 35484143
Fixes: 36392498
Test: cts-tradefed run cts-dev -m CtsAutoFillServiceTestCases --test=android.autofillservice.cts.SessionLifecycleTest
cts-tradefed run cts-dev -m CtsAutoFillServiceTestCases
Change-Id: I229acc1b3ce35fb57262da7d7466b5d4328b49d4
Using a feature will allow app developers to find out if a
particular device supports running activities on secondary
screens before using the APIs.
Bug: 36776777
Test: android.server.cts.ActivityManagerDisplayTests
Change-Id: I7121bdb782cac9df70121e9df5cbf3fcb76f4a93
These values can change for themes that are dependent on the size,
such as the DialogWhenLarge theme. In this case, different layouts
are loaded that could depend on updated LayoutParams.
This CL identifies the case when the layoutparams change and informs
the activity.
Change-Id: Icde8d94cc089ca0c02a15120a860533ef540c850
Fixes: 31643268
Test: cts/hostsidetests/services/activityandwindowmanager/util/run-test CtsServicesHostTestCases android.server.cts.ActivityManagerAppConfigurationTests#testDialogWhenLargeSplitSmall
This CL removes the strong reference added for mapping display ids
and Resources to Displays. Instead, the key pair is now the display
id and ResourcesKey, and the mapping is pruned when key is
invalidated.
Change-Id: If91368171212b28c40e03c15fb39c72412a44811
Fixes: 36625868
Test: make -j32 cts; cts-tradefed; run cts --module CtsAppTestCases --test android.app.cts.DisplayTest#testRotation
Change-Id: I342a133ae8d7f38008cb03706d160e6f2e2cca97
Fixes: 37002720
Test: Start instant app [adb shell am start -a android.intent.action.VIEW -c android.intent.category.BROWSABLE -d http://www.realestate.com.au/property-apartment-nsw-pyrmont-124879602] and see that hitting the 'share' icon works
As far as I can tell this has always been broken. We've always had
intermittent reports of buffer-queue-abandoned as well (a recent bug
came with some reports from N). During onStop SurfaceView relies on
onWindowVisibilityChanged, to trigger a visibility change. At this
point SurfaceView will emit the SurfaceDestroyed callback in order to
stop the client from further use of the Surface. The contract we've
been using with ViewRootImpl is at any point following
Activity.performStop returning the WindowManager was free to destroy
the Surfaces. This is why in setWindowsStopped we destroy the hardware
resources for the ViewRoot. However we aren't dispatching anything to
the SurfaceView. The WindowManager will send an app visibility
notification, but that would go through the handler. This means by the
time we return from Stop, there is no guarantee that the
onWindowVisibilityChanged callbacks have been invoked at all. It
seemed most sensible to dispatch the visibility callbacks directly. We
also ensure that getHostVisibility will return false after this point,
so that performTraversals will not reverse our visibility request if
it occurs again prior to the window visibility notification from the
WindowManager. We also guard against emitting a second window
visibility changed callback in the traversals. I don't know at this
point what value the window visibility notification provides but I
don't feel excited about removing it in this CL at this point in
the development cycle.
Test: Put Chrome in PiP. Turn screen off. No Crash!
Bug: 36561071
Change-Id: Id1673561b2299d477b2761b3ac6afa14eabbf7fb
Fix a bug where a malformed Parceled representation
of an AccessibilityNodeInfo could be used to mess with
Bundles as they get reparceled.
Bug: 36491278
Test: Verified that POC no longer works, a11y cts still passes.
Change-Id: I10f24747e3ab87d77cd1deba56db4526e3aa5441
(cherry picked from commit 687bb44b43)
Added ActivityManager#supportsMultiDisplay() to check if system
supports running activities on secondary displays.
Bug: 36776777
Test: android.server.cts.ActivityManagerDisplayTests
Test: #testMultiDisplayDisabled
Change-Id: I18f98f2f6a9e865ad8dc63a470210190536d3271
for callers with READ_CONTACTS permission.
Test: manual
Bug: 36983643
Change-Id: I1239a30a71cb13ce9ffff6f38b8506e9686abe4d
(cherry picked from commit d7e7a74179)
This CL removes the strong reference added for mapping display ids
and Resources to Displays. Instead, the key pair is now the display
id and ResourcesKey, and the mapping is pruned when key is
invalidated.
Change-Id: I60d767b52de7bbf769f6761f5a3301dd7aff6ddf
Fixes: 36625868
Test: make -j32 cts; cts-tradefed; run cts --module CtsAppTestCases --test android.app.cts.DisplayTest#testRotation
Delegate the action to WebViewProvider, by default it is no-op.
Bug: 36006397
Test: There is no implementation yet to test.
Change-Id: Ib5101d3669a92ae81cfb34cc5db607c374712a3d
Because English time patterns use uppercase letters by default (and a
comma to separate date and time when both are represented), we were
concluding they need internationalized input. Although they
literally do, let's keep the world simple and assume they don't need
internationalized input.
Compared to Nougat, we will now accept uppercase AM and PM and comma
for English if the IME allows them, we just continue to not signal
that an internationalized layout is needed.
Test: CTS tests pass
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=2626
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=82993
Bug: 8319249
Bug: 33276673
Bug: 34394455
Bug: 37079150
Change-Id: I82bfde323ba49ae1a27ff5c2e729063b7d81dcc8
android.display being in the foreground cpuset group is an issue. As
seen on M/S, during heavily CPU load it is not given core 3 even though
it might be free and causes jank. This patch adds the thread to the
top-app group to ensure it is placed on all cores during scheduling
decisions.
Doing this required a couple of changes:
- new API to set per-thread cpusets
- changes to DisplayManagerService to set the thread to top-app group
- changes to SystemServer to set the policy toward the end, as doing it
during start of the DisplayManagerService was in issue (issue being
SystemServer calls setSystemProcess.. -> setProcessGroup which overrides
the group settings for threads in the system server process, including
android.display)
Bug: 36631902
Test: Boot and make sure android.display thread is in the top-app group
Change-Id: Icc394ea0ffcf159d11728ad38de114234a29d20f
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 474d311cb0)
