Internal implementation of the puller API. Registers pullers by putting
them in the kAllPullAtomInfo map. Implements the actual pull,
with condition variables to timeout.
Lastly, keys the kAllPullAtom info by a PullerKey, which is a uid and
atom id. However, the uid is just set to a default of -1 for now. I will
work the security implementation in a follow up CL.
Test: builds, boots
Test: I will write unit tests in the future. It's very difficult to
write any without StatsEvent being completed.
Change-Id: Id602dd297b6ba7df811e2d5ab2e77efc0684e418
Since the data is stored in user encrypted storage,
we need an intermediate layer that can manage the per user
databases
Test: atest
Bug: 137396965
Change-Id: I66b6f830b3109e0df34d4bb95e32e5c035d0adac
go/cleanup-greylist-txt
These have already been greylisted, however due to bugs/omissions in the tooling have been kept in go/greylist-txt instead of being annotated in the code.
This is partial merge of aosp/Id6c1f5e403a0e66edb1102ee45f3bf19f244fb09. Telephony greylist cleanup has been done separately. Note that annotations outside of frameworks/base/ have been merged from AOSP.
Bug: 137350495
Test: m
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: merge
Change-Id: I015c466e8b69cc0fed5e9d394ba865aad11d8ba6
AuthService in its current form is a thin wrapper around
BiometricService. It initializes BiometricService in onStart();
registers fingerprint, face, and iris authenticators; and forwards all
of the incoming calls to the corresponding methonds in BiometricService.
The next step will be to move non-biometric related functionality from
BiometricService to AuthService, and turn BiometricService into a module
with a stable API.
Bug: 141025588
Test: atest AuthServiceTest
Test: atest BiometricServiceTest
Test: BiometricPrompt works in BiometricPromptDemo
Change-Id: Ia861b7c2d80bfca386c3e0b44ec35b4aca3b0ffc
Per design doc (go/android-car-mode-design), added new system API to
enable car mode and specify a priority for the calling app.
Also modified UiModeManager to pass the package name of the caller to
UiModeManagerService.
Bug: 136109592
Test: Added new unit tests and CTS tests.
Test: Added Telecom test app functionality to verify.
Change-Id: I2848039c9ea18ba93e7694e04c4e5dc70759daa3
To assess app compatibility problems early on, this CL blocks background
custom toasts in a non-secure way. We create a new method in the AIDL called
enqueueTextToast() that now contain the same parameters as
enqueueToast(), receiving the view created inside the app's process. But this
method will, in the future, contain a CharSequence instead of
ITransientNotification, for window creation inside the system.
We use PlatformCompat infrastructure to check if the change is enabled.
I learned with this change that if user blocks notifications for an app, it
won't be able to show background toasts, allowing me to re-use the foreground
check that was already in place.
This change will display a text toast (from the system) in case the app's
custom toast gets blocked, this is temporary to get feedback from
dogfood.
Test: With sample app targeting SDK 29, verify that:
1. Posting text toast in bg works
2. Posting custom toast in fg works
3. Posting custom toast in bg does NOT work
Test: With sample app targeting SDK 28, verify that 1, 2 and 3 above work.
Test: Working on CTS
Bug: 128611929
Change-Id: Icecbbeff081fa5e7c4329bf3b383d6859520b517
for oems which take telephony mainline module, all telephony related
apks will be signed with non-platform certificate. that said apks won't
be able to grant platform signature permission. Solution is to add a new
telephony protection level.
Bug: 141479803
Test: cts & manual
Change-Id: Ib3be016080d42fd76e7c131f4e44d815ce431e6e
(cherry picked from commit 45c183d201)
Merged-in: Ib3be016080d42fd76e7c131f4e44d815ce431e6e
Explains in more complete detail who should call lockNow(), when to call the method,
and what happens when there's no lock set on a device.
Test: make ds-docs -j32
Bug: 28831838
Change-Id: I5acc0cbfa63dffe8676e8b60476b584fd43b5bde
Since these are hidden it cannot be accessed by system service registery
Removing it for now and can be added later when these becomes SystemApi
Bug: 140768340
Test: Build & basic sanity
Change-Id: Ibb007f0a761bcbd006ebffbb552d0da82b586d03
This is needed for stacks to participate in transactions.
Most immediate use-case will be PiP during rotation
Bug: 119687367
Test: Added ActivityTaskManagerServiceTests#testStackTransaction
Change-Id: I50a5c3cea4f23f2be4e55ba38f8a5371fa9dfe79
Introduces the notion of 'user types' to UserManager.
Previously, users only had properties, set by UserInfo flags. We now
solidify some of these as formal user types. Each user must be of
precisely one user type. The configuration of each type is defined
in a UserTypeDetails object.
Prior 'types' - namely Guest, Restricted, ManagedProfiles, Demo, and
'normal' - that were set via UserInfo flags are now controlled via
UserType. Previous UserInfo flag methods for categorizing these are
still supported as long as no user of of more than one type.
If a user was (e.g.) previously both Guest and Demo, it is now
invalid and will be prevented from upgrading. This should not be a
problem in AOSP, where these 'types' were assumed mutually exclusive.
UserTypeDetails is sufficiently general to support future non-managed
profiles. To this end, the logic for specifying badges and their
colors/labels is contained by UserTypeDetails, and therefore
UserManager is responsible for delivering the corresponding badge
information.
Bug: 142151520
Test: added new test class UserManagerServiceUserTypeTest
Test: added additional tests in UserManagerServiceUserInfoTest
Test: added additional tests in UserManagerTest
Test: added additional tests in UserManagerServiceCreateProfileTest
Test: created UserTests to run the various pm.User*Test's
Test: atest \
com.android.server.pm.UserTests \
UserLifecycleTests \
ManagedUserContentResolverTest \
CtsDevicePolicyManagerTestCases \
CtsMultiUserHostTestCases \
com.android.server.devicepolicy.DevicePolicyManagerTest \
com.android.server.am.UserControllerTest \
CreateManagedProfileTaskTest
Test: atest com.android.server.pm.UserManagerServiceCreateProfileTest
using adb shell getprop persist.sys.max_profiles # for 5 and -1
Change-Id: Id1183a76055e9a7610965cf40b256d1392afe6f8
The cancel listeners are created per PendingIntent instance and were
spamming the callback list stored inside PendingIntentRecord. In cases
where there is even a single live PendingIntent backed by this
PendingIntentRecord, all PendingIntent instances backed by this
PendingIntentRecord for which a callback was ever registered will leak.
Test: atest FrameworksMockingServicesTests:\
com.android.server.am.PendingIntentControllerTest
atest FrameworksMockingServicesTests:\
com.android.server.AlarmManagerServiceTest
Bug: 143091024
Change-Id: I65df12da0c437064e6e3719911926738c677c4eb
Merged-In: I65df12da0c437064e6e3719911926738c677c4eb
(cherry picked from commit 0d51a8bcc0)
Now that RROs are loaded as shared libraries,
LoadedApk#makeApplication is attempting to find the onResourcesLoaded
method of the overlays. This is a performance hit and causes more
memory than necessary to be allocated during application start up.
Bug: 143314947
Test: com.android.performance.tests.HermeticMemoryTest
Change-Id: I3b8cd22dae83e0164d6678c80279f9fffceb34e6
