Activity.setImmersive(boolean) / android:immersive="bool" are now public.
In addition, if the foreground activity is immersive then an update lock
will be held on its behalf. This lets applications such as movie players
suppress the display of intrusive notifications, OTA-availability dialogs,
and the like while they are displaying content that ought not to be
rudely interrupted.
The update lock aspect of this mode is *advisory*, not binding -- the
update mechanism is not actually constrained; it simply uses this information
in deciding whether/when to prompt the user. It's more a guideline than
a rule.
Bug 7681380
Change-Id: I3c412a84cbf3933e3bf0168f2c71c54a86e4b7e5
RecentsActivity screenshots are called for very quickly after
WindowStateAnimator prepareSurface(). Without enough delay the
Surface.setLayer call does not propagate to the SurfaceFlinger
and the screenshot is incorrect (black) because it stops sampling
the layers too early.
This fix calls Surface.setSize() for each sampled Surface in
screenshots. setSize forces the SurfaceFlinger to process all
transactions queued before returning from closeTransaction.
Bug 7552304 fixed.
Change-Id: I1911dfa0b09cab713c55f5ba0c612496337a77df
Conflicts:
services/java/com/android/server/wm/WindowManagerService.java
There are two things going on here:
(1) In secondary users, some times theme information such as whether
the window is full screen opaque was not being retrieved, so the window
manager didn't know that it could hide the windows behind the app.
This would just be a performance problem, except that:
(2) There appear to be a number of applications that declare that they
are full screen opaque, when in fact they are not. Instead they are
using window surfaces with an alpha channel, and setting some pixels
in their window to a non-opaque alpha level. This will allow you to
see whatever is behind the app. If the system happens to completely
remove the windows behind the app, and somebody is filling the frame
buffer with black, then you will see what the app intends -- those
parts of its UI blended with black. If one of those cases doesn't
hold (and though we have never guaranteed they would, in practice this
is generally what happens), then you will see something else.
At any rate, if nothing else than for performance reasons, we need to
fix issue #1.
It turns out what is happening here is that the AttributeCache used
by the activity manager and window manager to retreive theme and other
information about applications has not yet been updated for multi-user.
One of the things we retrieve from this is the theme information telling
the window manager whether an application's window should be treated
as full screen opaque, allowing it to hide any windows behind it. In
the current implementation, the AttributeCache always retrieves this
information about the application as the primary user (user 0).
So, if you have an application that is installed on a secondary user but
not installed on the primary user, when the AttributeCache tries to retrieve
the requested information for it, then from the perspective of the primary user
it considers the application not installed, and is not able to retrieve that
info.
The change here makes AttributeCache multi-user aware, keeping all of its
data separately per-user, and requiring that callers now provide the user
they want to retrieve information for. Activity manager and window manager
are updated to be able to pass in the user when needed. This required some
fiddling of the window manager to have that information available -- in
particular it needs to be associated with the AppWindowToken.
Change-Id: I4b50b4b3a41bab9d4689e61f3584778e451343c8
...android.os.Parcel.nativeAppendFrom(Native Method)
The failing stack trace is:
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.nativeAppendFrom(Native Method)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.appendFrom(Parcel.java:428)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Bundle.writeToParcel(Bundle.java:1613)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeBundle(Parcel.java:605)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.location.Location.writeToParcel(Location.java:903)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeParcelable(Parcel.java:1254)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeValue(Parcel.java:1173)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeMapInternal(Parcel.java:591)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Bundle.writeToParcel(Bundle.java:1619)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeBundle(Parcel.java:605)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.location.Location.writeToParcel(Location.java:903)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeParcelable(Parcel.java:1254)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeValue(Parcel.java:1173)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeMapInternal(Parcel.java:591)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Bundle.writeToParcel(Bundle.java:1619)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.os.Parcel.writeBundle(Parcel.java:605)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.content.Intent.writeToParcel(Intent.java:6660)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at android.app.ApplicationThreadProxy.scheduleReceiver(ApplicationThreadNative.java:763)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at com.android.server.am.BroadcastQueue.processCurBroadcastLocked(BroadcastQueue.java:230)
11-20 20:29:04.365 19154 19170 E AndroidRuntime: at com.android.server.am.BroadcastQueue.processNextBroadcast(BroadcastQueue.java:777)
This is odd because where we do Bundle.writeToParcel(), we are just writing the Parcel
we have with its current length. There is no way this should be able to fail like this...
unless the Bundle is changed while we are running?
Hm.
It looks like the location manager is holding on to Location objects which have a
Bundle of extras. It is that Bundle of extras that the crash is happening on.
And the bundle extras can be changed as it operates. And there are places where
the raw Location object is returned from the location manager, which means the
caller can be olding on to a Location object whose extras can be changed at any
time by other threads in the location manager.
So that seem suspicious.
This change should take care of all these places in the location manager, by
making sure to copy the location object before it goes out of the location
manager.
In addition, add some code to the activity manager to not bring down the entire
system if there is a problem trying to send one of these broadcasts. There is
no need, we can just skip the broadcast as bad.
Change-Id: I3043c1e06f9d2931a367f831b6a970d71b0d0621
Also fix a little problem where the USER_STARTED broadcasts
were not being sent as ordered broadcasts(!).
Change-Id: I3aa3e0a9b3900967cdd2d115ee103371b0a50c41
In alarm manager, print a summary of the top 10 alarms by time
being executed. Keep track of execution time (and wake count) of
each type of alarm for each application so this can be printed in
the summary (and used to compute the top 10 alarms). Rework how
the alarm summary stats are tracked so that we don't need to hold
on to the full Intent for each stat and can get the Intent information
at the time the alarm is sent rather than waiting for whatever Intent
comes back in the result.
Also in the battery stats: sort the kernel wake locks by time, add
a new section showing all partial wake locks across all applications
sorted by time.
Finally a new LocalLog class that is used by AlarmManager to log
important warning messages, so these can also be later found in
its dumpsys output.
Change-Id: Icc07810053e60fb623a49937e696819cb8352b06
Omits service name from destroyed events, since it can be derived by
looking back to the created event with the same ServiceRecord.
Change-Id: Ib7ab1031c0859437735e1fc985d58f47629b7ac4
Many media files and source code files were marked as executable in Git.
Remove those.
Also a shell script and python script were not marked as executable.
Change-Id: Ieb51bafb46c895a21d2e83696f5a901ba752b2c5
When we are clearing activities off the top of a task, propagate
any activity options down from the top-most one to whatever top
activity we are keeping. This ensures that if we set the activity
options on the top activity of the task previously to give it the
correct animation, we still keep that animation for the activity
that really ends up being the top.
Change-Id: I6919b644a530ac283fe4d320496edc2bf72aa04e
Two distinct changes:
Fix a bug seen in the wild where a newly-launched application will be
spuriously asked to instantiate a backup agent. What was happening
there is that some Activity Manager state was being left stale in certain
circumstances, and then in combination with app uninstall / install, there
could be a case where uid reuse wound up looking like an app identity
match.
We now positively verify before instantiating the agent that the intended
backup target package is uid-compatible with the app process that the
instantiation was requested of. The incomplete bookkeeping in the
Activity Manager has also been tightened up, and the Backup Manager is
more aggressive about cleaning up pending operations pertaining to
apps being uninstalled.
Bug 5874010
Change-Id: Ic389f4a96c9dcd0ba6b3962b579084033d8ae9f8
...stale intent of force stopped app
Fixing this caused other problems elsewhere that we don't have time
to address at this point.
Fixes issue #7338275: Tapping clock home screen widget doesn't open
alarms anymore
Change-Id: Iedc1fae5f62b6ead28d1895d709591358e5d6634
...phase & callback API
I realized there were a few things wrong with what was there. The new
ACTION_USER_STARTING was not being sent for the first user at boot, and
there was an existing problem where ACTION_USER_STARTED was sent every
time there was a user switch.
Also improved some debug output of broadcasts to make it easier to see
what is going on in this stuff, and better reporting of why a service
couldn't be started.
Change-Id: Id8a536defbbad1f73d94a37d13762436b822fbe3
...running as the foreground user
Add UserManager.isUserRunning() which is the public version of the
existing method on ActivityManager.
Also add UserManager.isUserRunningOrStopping() since that seems like
it will be useful.
And fix the internal function that returns the array of currently
running users to not include stopped users.
Change-Id: I84672fa8748fc027fd402729586b5603f640e498
