A malicious application could overlay the activity. The overlay is
able to be tapped through, which can trick the user into starting a
harmful activity.
The CL added the flag SYSTEM_FLAG_HIDE_NON_SYSTEM_OVERLAY_WINDOWS for
the activity to prevent the tapjacking/overlay attack.
Bug: 205595291
Test: atest CtsHarmfulAppWarningHostTestCases
Change-Id: Ia1a1ae0dc451e04bf5c31e3cb8cf30a0d8e32991
(cherry picked from commit a04b3666b8)
If the lists of custom power components do not match, a crash will occur.
Instead of causing a crash, simply skip incompatible snapshots.
Bug: 196040329
Bug: 200511361
Test: atest FrameworksCoreTests:com.android.internal.os.BatteryUsageStatsProviderTest
Change-Id: I87ba605371a5f3119dcff33f6109e94ee46ab57d
(cherry picked from commit a1ea9ecd56)
Whenever suspension conditions change, if there is a user-visible
suspension-related dialog, dismiss it to ensure the user is never
looking at stale information.
Bug: 169137795
Test: atest SuspendPackagesBroadcastTest#sendPackagesSuspendModifiedForUser
Test: manual (steps below)
-enable EBS, tap on suspended app to see dialog
-enable Focus mode, ensure dialog is dismissed
-tap on suspended app again to see relevent dialog,
disable Focus mode, ensure dialog is dismissed
-tap on suspended app again to see relevant dialog,
disable EBS, ensure dialog is dismissed correctly
-can permute enable/disable steps to further verify
Change-Id: Ib1650f910f7441498424ab4bc92185ce432ac405
(cherry picked from commit 25e73a8b9e)
Use the passed-in user instead of the current user to determine
whether or not to add the work profile badge to direct share
target app icons, so that personal share targets do not have the
badge (even when sharing something from the work profile) and
work/managed share targets do have it (even when sharing something
from the personal profile).
Test: manual; tested appearance sharing from personal->work and
from work->personal
Bug: 197388251
Fix: 197388251
Change-Id: Ieee50d46e8058a92efa5be8aae9859447531c270
Today's flow of events is like this: key goes to focused app
(ViewRootImpl::processKeyEvent), the view hierarchy does not handle the
event, so ViewRootImpl uses FallbackEventHandler to invoke the fallback
action for this key.
The problem is that for many keys the app itself is closing system
dialogs before taking the appropriate action (often launching an
activity, eg. dialer for KEYCODE_CALL), but this is now prohibited in S
due to abuse of said action.
The long-term plan is to return to InputDispatcher the fact that the key
wasn't handled by the app and have ID call out to the policy, which will
launch the appropriate action and adjust the UI as it sees fit (close
system dialogs).
However, we need to prevent apps from crashing because of this, hence
this change for S still. The unfortunate effect is that system dialogs
won't be hidden in these cases, but this livable with until we properly
implement the infrastructure.
Bug: 199173862
Test: Simulate code-paths with affected keys and make sure apps don't
crash:
1. adb shell input keyevent --longpress KEYCODE_CALL
2. adb shell input keyevent --longpress KEYCODE_CAMERA
Change-Id: I44ad41ac1eac9acc8320298ceb4c1b21bde8af5d
Wakelock tracking in BatteryStats relies on the the isolated uid map
when tracking wakelocks from isolated uids. The map needs to keep the
isolated uid while it still has a wakelock.
Bug: 194414351
Test: atest BatteryStatsNoteTest
Change-Id: I5e51f5f90191829d12fb080169520d9827b9906c
(cherry picked from commit 83c0928c34)
Merged-In: I5e51f5f90191829d12fb080169520d9827b9906c
Handle the surface destroyed case and add a timeout for finish call.
Bug: 196171638
Bug: 197555842
Test: adb shell dumpsys SurfaceFlinger
Test: check the offscreen layers
Test: see 198714745#comment6
Change-Id: Ic6d2521d788c50e10b81b556849194a97f240376
Merged-In: Iec1eb82d1a4756a7b85c8fbdd05f4132a74c613c
The CancellationSignal passed into the authentication methods is not
associated with the request and can be used to cancel the current
operation, even if it is more recent. The new id prevents outdated
signals from being using.
Note that there are still issues with the Callbacks that are not
addressed (see bug for details).
Bug: 194405579
Bug: 189451155
Bug: 191716671
Test: atest com.android.systemui.biometrics com.android.server.biometrics
Change-Id: Id71be912cc88ae90df8087eb8f1a6fc3e110f883
Fixes: 195019654
Test: post CallStyle notification without custom action; observe text
Test: post CallStyle notification with custom action; observe buttons shrink to icon only.
Test: repeat tests using various font and screen sizes.
Change-Id: Icbd6189a1e03494e481e8672263570ae2657f946
Add attribution flags and chain IDs to start callbacks, and have the
PermissionUsageHelper listen for starts. This ensures that, if another
start happens while an op is already running, and has chain information,
then this chain information will be recorded.
Test: manual
Bug: 194198234
Change-Id: I0ab1aa0969b70e18001f4a814ea5689f9329a019
The original code is based on /proc/locks manpage. Unfortunately, that
manpage is never correctly updated to include the new field for blocked
locks. The new code detects the extra field. As StringTokenizer is too
heavy, ProcFileReader is used for better performance.
Bug: 194756340
Test: FrameworksUtilTests com.android.internal.util.ProcFileReaderTest
Test: FrameworksCoreTests com.android.internal.os.ProcLocksReaderTest
Test: No /proc/locks parsing exception with blocked locks
Change-Id: I4c9763f9d3091f7d84d2e4b672d7e5cb78b33f59
This reverts commit 002e656a51.
Reason for revert: Setting brightness using adb (adb shell settings put system screen_brightness ...) results in different brightness being set by DisplayPowerController each time.
Bug: 194791517
Test: atest HighBrightnessModeControllerTest
Test: manually test `settings put system screen_brightness 23` yields
consistent results
Change-Id: I6b49253b46e4d09a1f4129d3df950c9d36eb6ede
Since the current max can change for brightness due to
high-brightnes-mode (HBM), make it so that 255 is always mapped
to the current max, which can be different when in HBM or normal
brightness mode.
Bug: 187784093
Test: atest HighBrightnessModeControllerTest
Test: manually verify 255 is used for max when in HBM or not.
Change-Id: Ib0631fc12de0e8e4c7c638901d82c362e79944c3
* Mainline APEXes can only be updated by a modulesInstaller (an entry
in whitelisted-staged-installer.xml with isModulesInstaller="true")
* The whitelisted-staged-installer.xml file can have only one entry with
isModulesInstaller="true"
* Vendor APEXes can only be updated by an installer defined in the
corresponding entry in vendor-apex-allowlist.xml.
BYPASS_INCLUSIVE_LANGUAGE_REASON=existing occurrences
Test: atest StagedInstallInternalTest
Test: atest GtsStagedInstallHostTestCases
Test: atest CtsRollbackManagerHostTestCases
Test: atest CtsStagedInstallHostTestCases
Bug: 190802380
Change-Id: I729abb5153df079fb6885016a4b41d0acc827e3c
If begin and end invocations are at the same frame, the end vsync id
will be smaller than the begin vsync id, results in zero size jank info
array, the finish call will be missed as well, a leak happens.
Bug: 192140966
Test: atest FrameTrackerTest InteractionJankMonitorTest
Change-Id: I388558e60bdb84ad248a9afabe7776c4e6e67c57
This is partially a followup of
I80dabaf6ae0e781028dde16ead3321fbff319542 which removed these operations
from the SoundTrigger layer when the HotwordDetectionService is used.
Also fixes a race condition where the DSP event can go directly to the
Interactor if the DetectionService isn't connected.
Bug: 186164881
Test: atest HotwordDetectionServiceBasicTest
Test: manual - DSP and non-DSP
Change-Id: Iee3b00c6c08597ad1993fae677e9f8ae2f60744c
