- Smaller right_icons
- Higher-contrast text colors
- Dividers between actions
- Dividers above actions and overflows
- Consistent 8dp gutter on left of content
- BigTextStyle should not show line3 unless there is a subtext.
- Collapse summary ("overflow") text into line3. This is a
little wild because now the contentText, subText, and
summaryText all share this spot, but the various
variables all have different times when they're
expressed so you have greater control over what shows
where in the 1U and the expanded form.
- Do not show contentText in BigText's line3. If you have
subtext or summarytext, show that; otherwise suppress
line3 entirely.
Bug: 6558134 // line3
Bug: 6508804 // other visuals
Change-Id: Ib79e818a332d17000e9a8fce333eff8f8cf043aa
* commit '3c144c3e69405000f5c7542f20890437a4fb4987':
Add an updateAppPermission() API call to the AccountManagerService AIDL and have the GrantCredentialsPermissionActivity call that instead of a static so that it can be made to run in a different process than the AccountManagerService. Protect this call by checking that the caller has the same UID as the system process.
...device from JRN59D to JRN60
Deal correctly with multiprocess content providers that need to
be loaded into a secondary process; wasn't correctly detecting the
case where the IContentProvider returned by the activity manager
is null. (installProvider used to be given the direct IContentProvider,
now it gets the ContentProviderHolder and much check whether the
provider inside is null.)
Change-Id: I888622e275a459031ab849952941f39cf9c02ee0
1. We use a delayed callback to throttle the amount of accessibility
scroll events fired by the view tree. The callback to do so was
not properly reset when removed putting the view tree in a bad
state resulting in no scroll events being fired at all.
bug:6549005
Change-Id: Ibf72d7e009e4545a336c9471f46015910290703e
1. This attribute specifies whether a view can take accessibility
focus. It has three values: 1) auto - the system determines
based on whether the view is actionable and has actionable
predecessor. Accessibility services can put accessibility focus
on such a node at will; 2) yes ; this view always takes access
focus; 3) no - the view cannot takes accessibility focus and
accessibility services cannot put accessibility focus on it.
Change-Id: I2ebf4e7c75bf6b39e1742b6868b37ccdd4cc7d28
1. Iterators were skipping content on reversing direction.
2. The cursor was positioned at the beginning of the next text segment
when moving forward and at end of the previous text segment when moving
backwards. This is incorrect and now the cursor is positioned at the
end of the segment when moving forward and at the beginning when moving
backward.
3. The cursor position was not properly set when reaching the end/start
of the text.
4. The iterators were reporting strictly the next/previous segment even
if the cursor is within such a segment. Thus, when traversing some
content may be skipped. Now moving forward moves the selection to
the next segment end and the start position is either the old index
if it was within a segment or the start of the segment. Same in
reverse.
bug:6575099
Change-Id: Ib48a649cec53910339baf831a75e26440be6e576
...content provider and updating its oom adj
This introduces the concept of an "unstable" reference on a content
provider. When holding such a reference (and no normal stable ref),
the content provider dying will not cause the client process to be
killed.
This is used in ContentResolver.query(), .openAssetFileDescriptor(),
and .openTypedAssetFileDescriptor() to first access the provider
with an unstable reference, and if at the point of calling into the
provider we find it is dead then acquiring a new stable reference
and doing the operation again. Thus if the provider process dies
at any point until we get the result back, our own process will not
be killed and we can safely retry the operation.
Arguably there is still the potential for a race -- if somehow the
provider is killed way late by the OOM killer after the query or
open has returned -- but this should now be *extremely* unlikely.
We also continue to have the issue with the other calls, but these
are much less critical, and the same model can't be used there (we
wouldn't want to execute two insert operations for example).
The implementation of this required some significant changes to the
underlying plumbing of content providers, now keeping track of the
two different reference counts, and managing them appropriately. To
facilitate this, the activity manager now has a formal connection
object for a client reference on a content provider, which hands to
the application when opening the provider.
These changes have allowed a lot of the code to be cleaned up and
subtle issues closed. For example, when a process is crashing, we
now have a much better idea of the state of content provider clients
(olding a stable ref, unstable ref, or waiting for it to launch), so
that we can correctly handle each of these.
The client side code is also a fair amount cleaner, though in the
future there is more than should be done. In particular, the two
ProviderClientRecord and ProviderRefCount classes should be combined
into one, part of which is exposed to the ContentResolver internal
API as a reference on a content provider with methods for updating
reference counts and such. Some day we'll do that.
Change-Id: I87b10d1b67573ab899e09ca428f1b556fd669c8c
- Added radio buttons to indicate the selected item
- "Add account" is one of the list options instead of a button
- Removed icons
- Added "Cancel" and "OK" buttons
- Use dialog theme
- Omit description text by default
Bug 6505441
Change-Id: I672a11481ee99e183142142bddf8f97b7b149d37
Make clearer how the platform is handling key events following some
unfortunate uses by third party applications. Also highlight the
changes in Jelly Bean default keyboard.
Bug: 6566711
Change-Id: Ibcdaf54c6d629fd0733529bfe2fffc82f555f084
