Check and throw if callers request invalid grant flags. Add API to
test if a Uri is backend by a DocumentsProvider.
Bug: 10919391, 10935608
Change-Id: Ifa6afefb95983558c8c64dc15ddf650e9fe07080
Now when memory low, if a service's process is above
a selected pss, then the process is not allowed to go
in to the service a list.
Also simplified the normal meminfo details dump to not
include the shared dirty and shared clean sizes by
default, since these can be very confusing. You will
still get to see them with the "-a" flag.
Finally some small steps to better managing service
processes in the LRU list, so hopefully we can some
day be better about letting them drop down in the list
when there isn't really much interesting happening in
the process. Not yet used at this point.
Change-Id: I654bfd6d05de2a63120185ebb15ffda8cbeb5dac
Change our Intent flag to indicate that a Uri permission grant is
persistable, but don't actually persist it until explicitly taken by
the receiving app. This prevents apps from spamming each other if
persisted permissions aren't really required.
Remember the last time a persisted grant was taken by an app, and
use this to prune away the oldest grants when the number of grants
grows too large. Allow apps to query persisted grants they are
holding, and allow them to release previously persisted grants. Add
public UriPermission class to return grant details and timestamp.
Track various permission strengths separately, and combine together
after each mutation pass. Persistable grants are currently treated
like global grants, but they could be moved to have owners in the
future. Require that grant holders trying to extend a persistable
permission actually hold a persistable permission themselves.
Bug: 10835779
Change-Id: I95b2f797c04ce7fd2612f9a644685dbd44e03759
Any OpenGL memory reported by /proc/pid/smaps will not be included
in the GPU GL memory count and will be considered Unknown. This is
an artifact of how some memory reporting is done in libmemtrack
and some is done in this module.
bug:10294768
Change-Id: Id8fb63b2e86520f4dbc8410573a509e66b96b13b
This hasn't been used since at least 2011, and we're no longer
shipping the data supporting it either.
Change-Id: Ibe42057650b49794c65d6f0d54ed7a492f3b594b
* Don't run item click listeners as part of touch mode reset if the
ListView is being detached from its window. Some calling code makes
assumptions around this.
* Remove redundant state tracking for window attachment from
AbsListView now that we have View#isAttachedToWindow(). The timing
of View's mechanism is closer to what we want here anyway -
subclasses calling super.onDetachedFromWindow() as the first line of
an overridden onDetachedFromWindow() method will see the window as
being in a detached state while the rest of the method runs,
resulting in the behavior described in the first bullet point above.
Bug 10834897
Change-Id: Ic9fdff3c5cfc4996361a7fb1a863547b4d1a2c9c
The problem was that the ResolverActivity filters some activities
out of the list it shows, but it uses that display list as the
list of components the preference is set against when ultimately
setting it on the package manager... but that filtered list is *not*
the right component set, since it is not the same as the package
manager's view on it.
The fix here is to retain the original set of matching components
and use that when setting the preferred activity. Note that this
does mean that in very unusual cases where filtering is happeing
(such as one of the activities not being exported but being seen
as a possible completion from another app), then you will be setting
the preference for the complete set. Ultimately we probably need
to have the package manager apply these filtering rules up-front so
this is all consistent, but this is a very rare case so not that
important.
And then most of the change here is just improving the debug
output for intent resolution.
Change-Id: Ie35ac2c05a45946439951bbf41433c8b7de79c05
