For testing we often need to run shell commands. This can be done
today via running a shell command from an instrumentation test
started from the shell. However, this requires adding shell commands
which are not in the API contract, involve boilerplate code, require
string parsing, etc.
This change allows an instrumentation started from the shell to
adopt the shell UID permission state. As a result one can call APIs
protected by permissions normal apps cannot get by are granted to
the shell. This enables adding dedicated test APIs protected by
signatures permissions granted to the shell.
Test: cts-tradefed run cts-dev -m CtsUiAutomationTestCases
-t android.app.uiautomation.cts.UiAutomationTest#testAdoptShellPermissions
bug:80415658
Change-Id: I4bfd4b475225125512abf80ea98cd8fcacb6a1be
Combination of moving to existing public API, tagging things as
@TestApi, and bringing utility methods into tests.
Bug: 13282254
Test: atest cts/tests/tests/os/
Change-Id: Ifd24c0d048d200e8595e194890cc1dc53ddc2b3e
We're almost out of bits, and we don't really need to smash both
thread and VM policy into the same 32-bit value, so use the lower
16-bits for each policy type and the upper 16-bits for penalty.
ActivityManager is only consulting the penalty bits, so we can
remove getViolationBit() and switch CTS over to doing instanceof
checks.
Bug: 110413274
Test: atest cts/tests/tests/os/src/android/os/cts/StrictModeTest.java
Change-Id: I760e6a28f56da66dc75b7df9daf2167ff5bdff50
When an app starts becoming Direct Boot aware, it can be difficult
to track down all the places they're implicitly relying on
PackageManager filtering behavior.
For example, if the current Launcher isn't Direct Boot aware, we
hide it until the user is unlocked, which could confuse other Direct
Boot aware apps into thinking it had been uninstalled, which could
cause data loss.
This change helps apps track down places where they're implicitly
relying on the automatic filtering; they should instead carefully
choose a combination of MATCH_DIRECT_BOOT flags to decide on the
explicit matching behavior they want.
To implement this, we partially migrate the updateFlags() methods
out into ApplicationPackageManager, since the checking needs to
happen on the client side to correctly report StrictMode
violations. We don't currently mutate the flags, but we retain
the naming to keep that door open in the future.
Test: manual
Bug: 110413274
Change-Id: Iff6feba19da81ea1b4eeb3af821c3bdfbd9bf17c
Some permissions are getting split into foreground and background
variants. If an app only has the foreground version it can only access
the protected resource while the user is using it. Once the background
permission is added to the foreground permission the app can always
access the resource protected by the permission.
- Only having the background permission does grant anything.
- Mutliple foreground permission can share a single background permission,
but a foreground permission can not have multiple background
permissions.
- As the implementation of background permissions is based on AppOps
only the system can declare such foreground/background permissions
- A CTS test enforce that the background is in the same group as the
matching foreground permission.
Bug: 78788390
Test: Checked declared permission after boot and found new attributes
Change-Id: Ica7ba77b24345607c7467c41c982a58c39199024
First step in unifying the window hierarchy that is currently split
within AM and WM packages. We separate the interfaces and service dealing
with activities and their containers (tasks, stack, display) from the
rest of AM interfaces and services. This will allow us to move the new
interfaces and services to WM when the internal states are cleaned-up.
Test: Existing tests pass
Test: go/wm-smoke-auto
Bug: 80414790
Change-Id: Ide9b3f89123b768cdbd3e3878113c7a8021187f3
There's an escape clause that passes the cross user permissions
if the caller UID is identical to the target user ID [eg. we're not
operating across users]. However, the method getInstalledPackagesList()
uses android.permission.INTERACT_ACROSS_USERS to filter the results and
a calling UID check is not sufficient. Ensuure the permission is
actually held, regardless of the calling UID or target user.
Change-Id: Iebf88668766d387a15246d6eea6420610665105a
Fixes: 80435086
Test: atest CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases:ApplicationVisibilityTest
This would be use to determine the right activity state during CTS
test for products that have windowSwipeToDismiss set.
Also, dump ActivityRecord.fullscreen to proto for the same reason.
Bug: 76207986
Bug: 79167358
Test: atest CtsActivityManagerDeviceTestCases:ActivityLifecycleTests
Test: atest CtsActivityManagerDeviceTestCases:ActivityManagerAssistantStackTests
Change-Id: Iadc088e9129be088b8a083ebbafd8d20fe26b673
Currently, KeyEvent.keyCodeFromString(String name) requires the string
to either start with "KEYCODE_", or be directly convertible to an int.
However, the string representation of every keycode starts with
"KEYCODE_", so this requirement is redundant. Relax this requirement to
alllow both of the following usages:
1) keyCodeFromString("KEYCODE_BUTTON_A")
2) keyCodeFromString("BUTTON_A")
Currently, only 1) is supported.
The other usage,
3) keyCodeFromString("29")
is unchanged.
The input is no longer case-sensitive.
Improved the example of usage in the documentation: the input
"1001" suggests that the string must contain binary representation for
usage 3), while in fact it is supposed to be a base 10 number.
Test: atest cts.KeyEventTest#testKeyCodeFromString
Bug: 36069459
Change-Id: I54d7f9d1270748854143cc9d1e8af48c9ec0cd0f
This gives them a way to collect all included values without
resorting to manual probing of each newly added value.
Bug: 16207332
Test: atest com.android.cts.net.HostsideVpnTests
Change-Id: I35ca412512dc8515b44d5518e1ca4caa5bdc678f
So it can be changed without api breakage.
Fixes: 79204487
Test: atest android.permission.cts.AppOpsTest#testAllOpsHaveOpString
Change-Id: I7eb6d36e07108879dfd20b0432dd67925842631b
Currently, it is not possible to use KeyEvent.actionToString(..) in a
CTS test because that API is @hide. However, it would be useful to print
these actions when tests fail. Therefore, add the @TestApi annotation.
Bug: 77803694 36069459
Test: m cts-input-lib CtsHardwareTestCases (under development)
Change-Id: I2d23dbd101cef3f1c6c7a70c521a9dc219797615
Collecting network statistics is pretty heavy, which is why we're
throttling callers. However, to keep CTS running fast, we provide a
way for tests to force a poll event, instead of making them wait for
the throttle timeout.
Bug: 77908520
Test: atest cts/tests/tests/app.usage/src/android/app/usage/cts/NetworkUsageStatsTest.java
Change-Id: Ia792f0cd495023366ff8c4839df54e7da2ae8331
Added an annotation necessary to allow the power manager CTS test to
access the non-public method nap.
Test: adb install -r \
out/host/linux-x86/cts/android-cts/testcases/CtsOsTestCases.apk
adb shell am instrument -e class android.os.cts.PowerManagerTest \
-w android.os.cts/android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner
Change-Id: Ida939f074654bef351e2b8fd563c8463431ce9c6
Fixes: 77907164
