There were circumstances where mFocusedStack could be assigned the
home stack. If this were ever to occur then all subsequent tasks would
be put on the home stack. This fix ensures that there is no way that
mFocusedStack will ever be assigned to the home task.
Fixes bug 11271189.
Change-Id: I7ddd9b6bcbf2787cbe2f44b461ad057ae2241f00
The possibility existed that an activity was set to a task that it was
already being set to. If that were to happen, and it was the only
activity in the only task of the stack the stack would be deleted.
This fixes that situation and logs it as well to confirm that it does
fix bug 11272935. Logging to be deleted upon successful monkey run
exhibiting the log.
Change-Id: I436fdcc9a3734adad81d3ef90f29b93b3ac4dfcd
The existing code wasn't retaining the requested window bounds, if any,
and so could wind up rebatching alarms into much longer potential
delivery windows than originally demanded by the caller. This could
wind up delivering alarms outside their designated windows entirely.
Bug 11324357
Change-Id: I4d418cd08702e397b3c7692b412d4bf51d5d9e4b
When a translucent window is closing, the transition
animation to Launcher is janky because Launcher is
expected to be 'opening' but it has always been open
underneath the translucent window. Therefore, the
animation applied to the translucent app appears
janky.
bug:11253262
Change-Id: I9b6af3291d119e6927401f63785b12f25573f4eb
Also disables all setting of PAC networks through the internal AsyncChannel
methods. PAC can only be saved through addOrUpdateNetwork for permission
checks.
Bug: 11316946
Change-Id: I51016b578080c342a5e5d536ea9a3fdd4fe16644
In this case:
1. Privileged system app FOO is overlain by an installed update,
2. FOO was replaced during an OTA,
3. The new in-system FOO introduced new privileged permission requests
that had not been requested by the original FOO,
4. the update version of FOO still had a higher version code than
the new FOO on the system disk, and
5. the update version of FOO had been requesting these same (newly-
added-to-system-apk) permissions all along;
then the newly-added privileged permission requests were incorrectly being
refused. FOO should be able to use any privileged permission used by the
APK sited on the system disk; but instead, it was only being granted the
permissions used by the *original* version of FOO, even though the system
FOO now attempted to use them.
Still with me?
The fix is to (a) properly track privileged-install state when processing
known-to-be-hidden system packages, and (b) to tie the semantics of the
permission grant more explicitly to that evaluated state, rather than
using the prior (rather fragile) fixed-up privilege calculation applied
to the overlain apk's parse records.
Bug 11271490
Change-Id: Id8a45d667e52f3b5d18109e3620d5865f85bb9c9
The VPN permission check required internal knowledge that
other checks in the system would ensure that
package "com.android.vpndialogs" was genuine. In the
off chance those other checks change, or someone is
able to spoof the package name, this will at least
check to see that the app is on the system image; one
more hurdle to jump.
The original code for this change came from
https://android-review.googlesource.com/62270
Change-Id: I55580bee0b30036b0fee9ca4e43de9b736b194fe
Signed-off-by: William Roberts <wroberts@tresys.com>
Needed to do an http post instead of a get for one carrier.
Do this by putting an auto-submitting form in the data to be
interpreted as a html doc by the browser. The ACTION_VIEW
intent only works on http uri, but by specifying ACTION_MAIN/
CATEGORY_APP_BROWSER we could use data:text/html.
bug:11168810
Change-Id: Ifd33e1c3c7f9f40b6add39e446e6a7d7cde22549
Include volume UUID in generated document IDs to uniquely identify
volumes over time. Show volume label to users. Watch for mount
changes to update available roots.
Bug: 11175082
Change-Id: Ia151bde768587468efde0c1d97a740b5353d1582
