Provide a way for views to signal that they would prefer not
to have their parents scroll or otherwise rearrange when they
request focus to try to show the full focused view to the user.
In some cases this can be disruptive to the UX.
As of now, framework views do not respect this hint and custom
views such as those found in currently deployed support libs
don't either. The policy is left open to ViewParent subclasses
that implement requestChildFocus.
Bug 30256922
Change-Id: I55194de888fe2b8129be9a9aa21aa5e18cbb8296
starting a shortcut.
- Also add API surface to support launching multiple intents
- Also add SM.isRateLimitingActive() which was supposed to be
added but was not due to a bad rebase.
Bug 30218829
Change-Id: I82d60ec0df1e2b889538705f9f8870ee727dd55d
These methods were never meant to be public. Instead, developers
can use Context#createConfigurationContext().
Bug:30088019
Bug:29999297
Change-Id: I2b864136163deda0af99fa3bfe9ef4ee1077341a
This patch adds lifetime durations of DhcpClient states to
DhcpClientEvents.
To record the duration of a state, the event is now recorded when the
DhcpClient state machine exits that state.
In addition this patch removes event logging of StoppedState,
DhcpState and DhcpHaveLeaseState.
Change-Id: Ibd37b5e3070f35113b6b45942b1e1ff19c27a90b
This reverts commit c4b8f36de5.
Having InputContentInfo#requestPermission() should not hurt developers,
but we can polish the behavior in a subsequent CL without changing
the API.
Bug: 29450031
Bug: 29892936
Change-Id: I1b43c19417b643d0c269af860db2d309b73a90d5
Adds a new API that enables device-specific scheduler optimizations for
latency-sensitive VR threads.
BUG: 29163534
Change-Id: I58d7be0eb266eca452c804cd07004784fb7daf2b
It turns out that requiring editor authors to call
InputContentInfo#requestPermission() as needed is just confusing and can
cause compatibility issues, because if an editor author forgot to call
that method then there would be no way for IME developers to prevent
permission denial except for relaxing the default permission of the
ContentProvider just because of such an application. This is not what we
want to see.
My conclusion is that the system should automatically call
InputContentInfo#requestPermission() (or do any equivalent operation)
when InputConnection#INPUT_CONTENT_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION is
specified, like we have done in Context#startActivity().
With this CL, the system automatically grants a temporary URI permission
to the target application when the IME calls
InputConnection#commitContent() with
InputConnection#INPUT_CONTENT_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION, and the
temporary permission will be revoked by any of the following events:
- InputContentInfo#releasePermission() is explicitly called by the
target application.
- The target application returned false in
InputConnection#commitContent().
- All the InputContentInfo instances copied from the original one are
GC-ed.
Bug: 29450031
Bug: 29892936
Change-Id: I37fb744e4d3d1c59177fb0a9be4ef5c325c9a39f
This patch defines a new android.net.metrics.RaEvent class carrying
lifetime values contained in RA packets. RaEvent are recorded when
ApfFilter processes a new RA for which there is no match.
Example:
ConnectivityMetricsEvent(15:39:39.808, 0, 0): RaEvent(lifetimes: router=3600s, prefix_valid=2592000s, prefix_preferred=604800s, route_info=-1s, dnssl=-1s, rdnss=3600s)
Change-Id: Ia28652e03ed442d5f2a686ef5b3fafbcb77c503a
