The Lollipop release introduced a feature that allowed
apps to extend under the navigation bar. This also means
any popup window that is anchored to the bottom of its
parent window will overlap with the navigation bar if the
parent window is extending underneath the navigation bar.
This change introduces a new window flag
(FLAG_LAYOUT_ATTACHED_IN_DECOR) that allows the app to
specify if the popup window should be attached to the decor
frame of the parent window thereby avoiding an overlap
with the screen decorations.
By default the flag is set on SDK version LOLLIPOP_MR1 or
greater and cleared on lesser SDK versions.
Also, replaced flags FLAG_NEEDS_MENU_KEY and
PRIVATE_FLAG_NEEDS_MENU_KEY_SET with needsMenuKey state
variable to make room for the new
FLAG_LAYOUT_ATTACHED_IN_DECOR flag.
Bug: 17789629
Change-Id: I2150e0c6ac688c966c0e8f7e54d42fd20285bea6
This is not a complete solution, and it's still awkward to use for
actually setting the time using the radial time picker. Better
software keyboard support and explore-by-touch CLs are still pending.
BUG: 17994166
Change-Id: Ia2871840a13cb00c140f7f2ab07fe03371acab2f
The selectors are now CheckedTextViews, which makes more sense when
using a screen reader.
BUG: 17468036
Change-Id: I09c62a08172a710faa8fb7ed2bf99a66331e5701
In accessibility mode when iterating over the text of a TextView we
use the selection to keep track of the current position. Consequentally,
if the text of a TextView does not support selection we change the text
to Spannable. Doing that has performance cost. While we need selection
support before we used to convert the text to Spannable even if we do
not need to. Now this transformation happens only when the user decides
to traverse the text which is very rare as opposed to doing this for
every TextView.
bug:17491082
Change-Id: Id7e82e01034e439b5d34133b9350a4efc4d19d4a
Previously we would loop forever if a selection notification was
posted after data had changed but the data changed bit was never
reset (e.g. a layout pass never occurred). This moves the pending
notification to occur as part of a layoutChildren() /
checkSelectionChanged() pass. If the client does horrible things
to prevent layout, no notification will occur -- but we won't loop
forever.
BUG: 17736536
Change-Id: I9773a769ad402c92dcbe2af7b8982d4443001961
The motivation is an API change: FloatMath is going to be
deprecated and/or removed. Performance is not the goal of
this change.
That said...
Math is faster than FloatMath with AOT compilation.
While making the change, occurances of:
{Float}Math.sqrt(x * x + y * y) and
{Float}Math.sqrt({Float}Math.pow(x, 2) + {Float}Math.pow(y, 2))
have been replaced with:
{(float)} Math.hypot(x, y)
Right now there is no runtime intrinsic for hypot so is not faster
in all cases for AOT compilation:
Math.sqrt(x * x + y * y) is faster than Math.hypot(x, y) with
AOT, but all other combinations of FloatMath, use of pow() etc.
are slower than hypot().
hypot() has the advantage of being self documenting and
could be optimized in future. None of the behavior differences
around NaN and rounding appear to be important for the cases
looked at: they all assume results and arguments are in range
and usually the results are cast to float.
Different implementations measured on hammerhead / L:
AOT compiled:
[FloatMath.hypot(x, y)]
benchmark=Hypot_FloatMathHypot} 633.85 ns; σ=0.32 ns @ 3 trials
[FloatMath.sqrt(x*x + y*y)]
benchmark=Hypot_FloatMathSqrtMult} 684.17 ns; σ=4.83 ns @ 3 trials
[FloatMath.sqrt(FloatMath.pow(x, 2) + FloatMath.pow(y, 2))]
benchmark=Hypot_FloatMathSqrtPow} 1270.65 ns; σ=12.20 ns @ 6 trials
[(float) Math.hypot(x, y)]
benchmark=Hypot_MathHypot} 96.80 ns; σ=0.05 ns @ 3 trials
[(float) Math.sqrt(x*x + y*y)]
benchmark=Hypot_MathSqrtMult} 23.97 ns; σ=0.01 ns @ 3 trials
[(float) Math.sqrt(Math.pow(x, 2) + Math.pow(y, 2))]
benchmark=Hypot_MathSqrtPow} 156.19 ns; σ=0.12 ns @ 3 trials
Interpreter:
benchmark=Hypot_FloatMathHypot} 1180.54 ns; σ=5.13 ns @ 3 trials
benchmark=Hypot_FloatMathSqrtMult} 1121.05 ns; σ=3.80 ns @ 3 trials
benchmark=Hypot_FloatMathSqrtPow} 3327.14 ns; σ=7.33 ns @ 3 trials
benchmark=Hypot_MathHypot} 856.57 ns; σ=1.41 ns @ 3 trials
benchmark=Hypot_MathSqrtMult} 1028.92 ns; σ=9.11 ns @ 3 trials
benchmark=Hypot_MathSqrtPow} 2539.47 ns; σ=24.44 ns @ 3 trials
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=36199
Change-Id: I06c91f682095e627cb547d60d936ef87941be692
