Explains in more complete detail who should call lockNow(), when to call the method,
and what happens when there's no lock set on a device.
Test: make ds-docs -j32
Bug: 28831838
Change-Id: I5acc0cbfa63dffe8676e8b60476b584fd43b5bde
Doc currently says "The method will return whether [the attribute] is equal to zero", which could be read as "returns true if the attribute is zero", which is incorrect. Rephrased as: "...returns false if the attribute is equal to zero, and true otherwise."
Change-Id: Ie7d763ac2784ecc3a7fb522b4fa583ec8d2644d4
BUG: 143049875
Test: make ds-docs
No change to logic, only docs.
This clarifies the docs for onShowCustomView. This @links to
FLAG_FULLSCREEN, reminds the developer they must override both
onShowCustomView and onHideCustomView, and provides guidance for
CustomViewCallback.
Bug: 143247282
Test: make -j4 docs
Change-Id: I64de3723674da5c138438921cc8232c4bf2a3d98
Inform developers that having onscreen zoom controls is deprecated and
that it's therefore not recommended to enable them in WebView, with
reference to ZoomButtonsController (which is what WebView uses to
implement them).
Bug: 141732094
Test: make ds-docs
Change-Id: I134551b87d3a93072e28aef56667507214b3e9c4
And also pre-grant it to all apps that currently get any storage
permission pre-granted
Test: atest SplitPermissionTest
m -j gts && gts-tradefed run commandAndExit gts-dev -m GtsPermissionTestCases --test=com.google.android.permission.gts.DefaultPermissionGrantPolicyTest#testDefaultGrantsWithRemoteExceptions
Manual testing:
All combinations of
- App targetSdk = 28 and 29 (and 22 for extra credit)
- App having the <uses-permission> tag for
ACCESS_MEDIA_LOCATION or not
- Upgrade from P->Q-QPR and from vanilla Q->Q-QPR
Further upgrade of targetSdk from 28->29 while on Q-QPR
==> All permission behavior should make sense. Sometimes there
are weird, but expected behaviors. Hence we need to
collect the results and then look at the unexpected ones.
See SplitPermissionTest for some tests I added for the
location-background permission which was split from
the fine/coarse-location permissions
Fixes: 141048840,140961754
Change-Id: Ib9f50d25c002036f13cf2d42fc4d1b214f20920c
(cherry picked from commit ac7b10c135)
RFC2109 has been obsolete for a long time, and the docs aren't very
clear what exactly the RFC has to do with CookieManager; the RFC is
about HTTP and it's not immediately clear how this would apply to a Java
API.
Update the reference to the current cookie spec (and hyperlink it), and
clarify the text to explain that the HTTP header formats from the RFC
are the formats used to get/set set cookies.
Fixes: 143086151
Test: make ds-docs
Change-Id: I5e5838d3435b74516847b63e485fdd93810284aa
We had accidental usages of the PermissionChecker for cases where no
private data was provided to the app but the checkPermission API on
the latter also did blame data access on the app. The PermissionChecker
was designed to handle IPC calls and not for generic API checks.
To avoid future accidental incorrect PermissionChecker usages this
change renames the existing APIs of the latter to clearly indicate
that they should be used for data delivery and also adds sibling
methods for doing the same permission checks for preflight purposes.
Also the documentation is improved to furhter assist developers.
In addition, this change fixes accidental permission checker usages
that blame when they should not by using the new preflight flavor
of the permission check APIs.
Test:
atest com.android.settingslib.location.RecentLocationAppsTest
atest CtsPermissionTestCases
added: LocationAccessCheckTest#notificationOnlyForAccessesSinceFeatureWasEnabled
added: LocationAccessCheckTest#noNotificationIfFeatureDisabled
added: LocationAccessCheckTest#noNotificationIfBlamerNotSystemOrLocationProvider
added: LocationAccessCheckTest#testOpeningLocationSettingsDoesNotTriggerAccess
bug:141028068
Merged-In: I65c71569d0dd8a40bc6fecabb22c5373dd6e806e
Change-Id: I65c71569d0dd8a40bc6fecabb22c5373dd6e806e
