When an activity is moved to a stack using the
ActivityStack#moveActivityToStack API a new task is created to
hold the activity in the stack. However, when the new task is
created in the window manager side it uses the stack id of the
previous stack the activity was in. We now pass the stack to use
from activity manager to window manager.
Bug: 25987309
Bug: 25961636
Change-Id: Iecc71f6d9b3e70a8d88e134b42f7532ba5327bad
Add a TYPE_QS_DIALOG window type, that is in the same layer as
apps and dialogs and such. It is guarded by having a token
that is granted by SysUI after a click has occured. If the
app shows a dialog before listening finishes (QS closes) then
the token will stay granted until the tile is removed by the
user, otherwise the token will be removed immediately to avoid
later dialogs.
Also fix a couple tiny TileService issues:
- Stop/Start listening reversed
- Fix javadoc referencing wrong action
Change-Id: Iedcdd5fd9a2af2b33eb7f6f17bb0e6c997879876
The work challenge should be locked whenever the device goes to sleep + admin
timeout or when the power button is pressed if the lock setting is on.
This change creates the infrastructure to lock a specific user instead of the
device and uses it in these cases. Then, the current code that brings up the
work challenge can check to only show it if the user is locked.
Change-Id: I89b4342b1458d97734d7afa66be52bf04ec3a3d4
Just assign mUri directly instead of calling setUri()
to avoid flipping mIsAppProvidedWebUri to true exactly
when it shouldn't be.
Also, make sure the boolean gets un/parceled.
Bug: 25952056
Change-Id: I973e585d04a73c2b7eab5975ea7f2b447b270c26
Make the meaning of CONTENTS_FILE_DESCRIPTOR more explicit, and
emphasize that describeContents() applies to the current object
instance, not to the class generically.
Change-Id: Ie5010e24c2e57bdc6c982249adb9d4c871d46f5a
A recent change tightened the check for whether or not an APK has code.
The check verified against the application and not the individual split.
Bug: 25769800
Change-Id: Ia53bd0e31ce3379bdd8bfe6d0c3da99b6d65fe31
No longer throws when calling cancel() with a null PendingIntent if
the app targets SDK < NYC.
Bug 25798631
Change-Id: Ic91f42808811645b01802abcc785f4218aac0e8b
This is required to expand metadata capabilities of DragEvent.
Apps receiving ACTION_DRAG_* events have access to
ClipDescription, but not ClipData.
Adding extras to ClipDescription allows for a richer behavior of apps
responding to these events.
Bug: 25788641
Change-Id: I07e374f71d16f8441dc3a0b02c7d833e0139b74b
* changes:
FalsingManager Quick settings fix
Fixed a bug where the panel could be too small in certain cases
Fixed a bug where the margins where not updated correctly
Fixed the handling of the expand on the lockscreen
Windows in the pinned stack shouldn't receive input keys, so we prevent
they from gaining window focus so the focus/input keys goes to the stack
below the pinned stack.
Also, cleaned up some code.
Bug: 25580816
Change-Id: Iea1f944d167310233c3dbaea140a4ada568bb815
It forces the user to stop instead of going into the background. Also
changed behavior of stopUser method. Now it also attempts to stop related
users along with the specified userId.
Based on ag/807976, with the only difference that it's now a user restriction.
Bug: 24579258
Bug: 24708668
Change-Id: I357298908816fc58feeed83b7e9979fc33d25da6
The body of {@code} must not be HTML escaped. This is one of
several changes that fix the source in conjunction with a
doclava fix.
Bug: 25757239
Change-Id: Ib38a0fa2dd2a3d68e467f78a812071e763d7e881
For some markets we have to allow the user to review permissions
for legacy apps at runtime despite them not supporting the new
permission model. This is achieved by showing a review UI before
launching any app component. If an update is installed the user
should see a permission review UI for the newly requested
permissions.
To allow distinguishing which permissions need a review we set
a special flag in the permission flags that a review is required.
This flag is set if a runtime permission is granted to a legacy
app and the system does not launch any app components until this
flag is cleared. Since install permissions are shared across all
users the dangerous permissions for legacy apps in review mode
are represented as always granted runtime permissions since the
reivew requirement is on a per user basis.
Whether the build supports permission review for legacy apps is
determined by a build constant allowing us to compile away the
unnecessary code for markets that do not require a permissions
review.
If an app launches an activity in another app that has some
permissions needing review, we launch the permissions review
UI and pass it a pending intent to launch the activity after
the review is completed.
If an app sends a broadcast to another app that has some permissions
needing review, we do not deliver the broadcast and if the sending
app is in the foreground plus the broadcast is explicit (has a
component) we launch the review UI giving it a pending intent to
send the broadcast after the review is completed.
If an app starts a service in another app that has some permissions
needing review, we do not start the service and if the calling app
is in the foreground we launch the review UI and pass it a pending
intent to start the service after the review is completed.
If an app binds to a service in another app that has some permissions
needing review, we schedule the binding but do not spin the target
service's process and we launch the review UI and pass it a callback
to invoke after the review is completed which spins the service
process and completes the binding.
If an app requests a content provider in another app that has some
permissions needing review we do not return the provider and if
the calling app is in the foreground we show the review UI.
Change-Id: I550f5ff6cadc46a98a1d1a7b8415eca551203acf
Remove code duplication in SelectionStartHandleView and
SelectionEndHandleView by introducing SelectionHandleView.
Change-Id: I4486019714b13d184a72cf7ee60c346c4d8b5f5a
Now that the activity manager keeps track of per-uid process states,
we can push that already rolled-up data into battery stats to directly
track the times in those states.
The problem with the reporting was actually that we weren't dealing
correctly with negative process states, which is now fixed. (It was
interpreting them as FOREGROUND rather than not running.)
Also split out a number of new states -- TOP, FOREGROUND_SERVICE,
TOP_SLEEPING -- from FOREGROUND. This should allow us to get a much
better idea of how much an app has been actively in use: TOP is when
it is directly visible to the user or in use by such, FOREGROUND_SERVICE
is when it is running in the background in a way the user is aware of.
Also when reporting these numbers, they are no longer added together as
reported but kept as separate times.
Change-Id: I6d307503a4b4ad5c0d5d49305ef63f8eb858e2c9
The status has always been there in error cases, it is now also visible
in non-error cases.
If the progress is not set, no progress bar is shown.
Bug: 24135025
Change-Id: Iea23f45d236365433c6f6739597833d236ed6d19
Minimally deform CopyService such that we can listen
to the completion of operations in the test.
Add test coverage.
Add equals and hashcode to DocumentInfo...so we can compare
the heck out of 'em. + a test.
WIP: Expose (@hide style) DocumentsProvider.isChildDocument via
DocumentsContract. Use that to check for recusive copies.
Bug: 25794511
Change-Id: I05bb329eb10b43540c6806d634e5b96a753e8178
When updating a notification, the end margin was not
correctly updating, leading to overlapping text with
the image.
Change-Id: Ica3d21ff0268105d0a8a73527b8dad0225e12d5a
