The main problem here was a mistake when turning a single process
structure to a multi-package-process structure with a common
process. When we cloned the original process state, if there were
any services already created for the process for that package, they
would be left with their process pointer still referencing the
original now common process instead of the package-specific process,
allowing the active counts to get bad. Now we switch any of those
processes over to the new package-specific process.
There was also another smaller issue with how ServiceRecord is
associated with a ServiceState -- we could be waiting for an
old ServiceRecord to be destroyed while at the same time creating
a new ServiceRecord for that same service class. These would share
the same ServiceState, so when the old record finally finished
destroying itself it would trample over whatever the new service
is doing.
This is fixed by changing the model to instead of using an "active"
reference count, we have an object identifying the current owner
of the ServiceState. Then when the old ServiceRecord is cleaning
up, we know if it is still the owner at that point.
Also some other small things along the way -- new Log.wtfStack()
method that is convenient, new suite of Slog.wtf methods, fixed
some services to use Slog.wtf when catching exceptions being
returned to the caller so that we actually know about them.
Change-Id: I75674ce38050b6423fd3c6f43d1be172b470741f
Previously we relied on having a continue stream of sensor
events from which to detect whether the device is moving or
at rest. However, if the sensor HAL is broken in some way
then we might not receive enough sensor events to actually
finish the detection process. When this happens, we'll
just sit there holding a wakelock indefinitely.
Instead of relying on the sensor event stream, post a delayed
message to explicitly finish detection.
Bug: 10769163
Change-Id: Ia2ed66fe5e7c41a8832df76da9104c13554e1398
- Call in all circumstances but only set launchHomeTaskNext for
focused stack. Previous version didn't call handleAppDiedLocked for
non-focused stack.
- Rearrange logic to run down the top task and make sure that all
remaining activities belong to the dying app. Previous version just
looked at the top non-finishing activity and based its behavior on
that.
Fixes bug 11029560.
Change-Id: Ic3a7c873c4c975577d6b390a8955ff41729bdfde
Should fix the array index out of bounds. valueAt() is when we have the
index, not the key.
Bug: 11014210
Change-Id: Icb53fe763782befbd5de1b3df6630b87cda72e84
If two activities are started at the same time the first activity can
add a starting window but never start. In that case there is no event
that will clear the starting window. This change adds a 10 second
timeout for the starting window to be cleared after which it will
clear the starting window automatically.
Fixes bug 10797865.
Change-Id: I1d59c3058c63367ff688d426474e8a6f006b2e0d
All ContentProvider calls are currently blocking, making it hard for
an app to recover when a remote provider is wedged. This change adds
hidden support to ContentProviderClient to timeout remote calls,
treating them as ANRs. This behavior is disabled by default.
Update DocumentsUI to use a 20 second timeout whenever interacting
with a storage provider.
Bug: 10993301, 10819461, 10852518
Change-Id: I10fa3c425c6a7225fff9cb7a0a07659028230cd3
It is possible that a print job is scheduled for handling, i.e. it is
queued, after the target print service is uninstalled or disabled.
In case like this we fail the print job with an appropriate error
message. Now the user can cancel the job when he/she sees the notification
or the status in the print settings. Trying to restart such a job will
end up failing it again with the same error message. So the user will
just have to canel the print job.
This apporach quarantees that the user is informed for the failure and
also is much simpler than trying to update the UI when print job's
target serivce is uninstalled. For example, the settings UI has to
be updated as well as the notifications. Also due to the async nature
of the system this we cannot completely avoid having a restart option
for a print job whose target service is gone. This scenario is very
unlikely but still we have to handle it.
bug:11012251
Change-Id: Id8c8c3cff75e0b6325552676b130ff1406edc069
