The android package is now a special case, not being added to the package list
when creating a multi-process component. There is no need, since this package
is actually the framework itself which must be loaded in every process.
Also cleaned up some of the procstats dump output to help see what is going
on here.
Change-Id: If65d35ecd562f3154bdebfded69c454af6ce8c96
Because properly continuing permission grants post-OTA has changed
policy to include privilege considerations based on install location,
make sure that we re-evaluate when we determine that the apk has
moved from its pre-OTA location.
Bug 11271490
Change-Id: I6c09986e2851a67504268b289932588457c05dfc
The WindowManagerService member mLowerWallpaperTarget is not stable
throughout an app transition. Relying on it to be stable causes the
intra-wallpaper animation to start out right but after the windows
have been relayed out there is no longer a lower wallpaper target.
This causes the wallpaper to start tracking the animation of the
current wallpaper target rather than remain stable.
Switching to a new variable that saves the state of wallpaper
animation at the start of the animation fixes bug 11240590.
Change-Id: I336a59c47665fcf61019f567b8663956ff0e4940
When finishing or stopping an activity the code was automatically
refocusing to the next activity on the same stack independent of the
task's onTopOfHome flag. When the activity eventually finished or
stopped it would then honor the onTopOfHome flag.
This fix examines the onTopOfHome flag and arranges the focus
correctly if home is the next activity to run.
Fixes bug 11318263.
Change-Id: I73a8f5e82de04b01acaffe366b085f9e475e1451
There were circumstances where mFocusedStack could be assigned the
home stack. If this were ever to occur then all subsequent tasks would
be put on the home stack. This fix ensures that there is no way that
mFocusedStack will ever be assigned to the home task.
Fixes bug 11271189.
Change-Id: I7ddd9b6bcbf2787cbe2f44b461ad057ae2241f00
The possibility existed that an activity was set to a task that it was
already being set to. If that were to happen, and it was the only
activity in the only task of the stack the stack would be deleted.
This fixes that situation and logs it as well to confirm that it does
fix bug 11272935. Logging to be deleted upon successful monkey run
exhibiting the log.
Change-Id: I436fdcc9a3734adad81d3ef90f29b93b3ac4dfcd
The existing code wasn't retaining the requested window bounds, if any,
and so could wind up rebatching alarms into much longer potential
delivery windows than originally demanded by the caller. This could
wind up delivering alarms outside their designated windows entirely.
Bug 11324357
Change-Id: I4d418cd08702e397b3c7692b412d4bf51d5d9e4b
When a translucent window is closing, the transition
animation to Launcher is janky because Launcher is
expected to be 'opening' but it has always been open
underneath the translucent window. Therefore, the
animation applied to the translucent app appears
janky.
bug:11253262
Change-Id: I9b6af3291d119e6927401f63785b12f25573f4eb
Also disables all setting of PAC networks through the internal AsyncChannel
methods. PAC can only be saved through addOrUpdateNetwork for permission
checks.
Bug: 11316946
Change-Id: I51016b578080c342a5e5d536ea9a3fdd4fe16644
In this case:
1. Privileged system app FOO is overlain by an installed update,
2. FOO was replaced during an OTA,
3. The new in-system FOO introduced new privileged permission requests
that had not been requested by the original FOO,
4. the update version of FOO still had a higher version code than
the new FOO on the system disk, and
5. the update version of FOO had been requesting these same (newly-
added-to-system-apk) permissions all along;
then the newly-added privileged permission requests were incorrectly being
refused. FOO should be able to use any privileged permission used by the
APK sited on the system disk; but instead, it was only being granted the
permissions used by the *original* version of FOO, even though the system
FOO now attempted to use them.
Still with me?
The fix is to (a) properly track privileged-install state when processing
known-to-be-hidden system packages, and (b) to tie the semantics of the
permission grant more explicitly to that evaluated state, rather than
using the prior (rather fragile) fixed-up privilege calculation applied
to the overlain apk's parse records.
Bug 11271490
Change-Id: Id8a45d667e52f3b5d18109e3620d5865f85bb9c9
