The purpose of this change is to remove direct reliance on
SurfaceFlinger for describing the size and characteristics of
displays.
This patch also starts to make a distinction between logical displays
and physical display devices. Currently, the window manager owns
the concept of a logical display whereas the new display
manager owns the concept of a physical display device.
Change-Id: I7e0761f83f033be6c06fd1041280c21500bcabc0
We don't actually need the raw size in these places.
The logical size is good enough.
Starting to move dependencies on surface flinger
and window manager out of the Display class.
Change-Id: I2065bee8e5bf7f42c5a452dd1e8479e40ebb0d37
Optimizations in drawing and invalidation in JB did not correctly
account for static child transforms
(View.getChildStaticTransformation()).
For the invalidation part, this meant that views were not properly
setting the invalidation bounds (which should be transformed by
the static transform), so the affected area of the invalidation
was potentially incorrect. For the drawing part, this meant that
views outside of their parent's bounds were being incorrectly
rejected when the static transform would, in fact, place the views
inside of those bounds.
The fix is in two parts:
- drawing: avoid the early quickReject() logic for containers that
have static transformations set on them
(ViewGroup.setStaticTransformationsEnabled()).
- invalidation: Include the static transform in the invalidation
area propagated up the view hierarchy.
Issue #6864203 The child position outside of parent is not drawn
even it will be drawn inside of the parent after applying static
transformation
Change-Id: I73bea01feab250bdcae2d575313be355a4a3c8f5
The objective of this refactoring is to remove the reliance on
WindowManager wrapper objects for compatibility mode and for
managing sub-windows.
Removed the WindowManager.isHardwareAccelerated() method since
it is never used.
Change-Id: I4840a6353121859a5e0c07d5cc307a437c595d63
1. If a view's important for accessibility attribute is set to auto the
framework is responsible to determine if it really is. Views with
accessibility node providers should be important for accessibilty
since they are roots of virtual view trees and such trees are
always important.
bug:6843043
Change-Id: I4b352c59fdefdf9ad220714a43ecb9e01d1c1c1f
Bug 6448164
generateViewId provides a way for applications to generate opaque ID
values suitable for use with View#setId that will not collide with
values generated by aapt for R.id.
Fix a bug where RadioGroup assumes object hash codes will always be
positive.
Change-Id: I3e2870cd672d6061bb465128f428c81aeef0c44b
1. The window manager was not notifying a window when the latter
has been moved. This was causing incorrect coordinates of the
nodes reported to accessibility services. To workaround that
we have carried the correct window location when making a
call from the accessibility layer into a window. Now the
window manager notifies the window when it is moved and the
workaround is no longer needed. This change takes it out.
2. The left and right in the attach info were not updated properly
after a report that the window has moved.
3. The accessibility manager service was calling directly methods
on the window manager service without going through the interface
of the latter. This leads to unnecessary coupling and in the
long rung increases system complexity and reduces maintability.
bug:6623031
Change-Id: Iacb734b1bf337a47fad02c827ece45bb2f53a79d
View.draw() calls computeScroll() to initialize scrolling values correctly.
But getDisplayList() also calls computeScroll() for the same reason, resulting
in 2 calls to that method for hw-accelerated views.
Fix: avoid calling computeScroll() in View.draw() for views with display lists.
Change-Id: I57a3862e2d554752cd0fdb862513cbb3dfb3105c
An optimization prunes invalidates on views which are not inside their
parent's bounds. This works in most cases, but it is possible to run
a situation where a view has been invalidated (and is thus waiting to
be redrawn), but the pruning logic ensures that that draw call
will not happen. Further, when/if the view comes into the bounds
of its parent again, it may still not be redrawn, because now future
invalidates on the view are noop'd because it is already in an invalidated
state (and thus will not propagate invalidates up the hierarchy).
The fix is to remove the optitmization. This will cause some overhead
sending the invalidation request up to the view root, but this
overhead is minimal (and only extra for cases of out-of-bounds views),
and the more expensive part of rendering these views will still not be done
since the view root will avoid re-drawing the hierarchy when the dirty
rectangle is empty.
Issue #6813661 offscreen views don't get invalidated properly (may remain invisible when returning onscreen)
Change-Id: Ic4b439540084a7163be9afc585bea6560d073280
Before this change, changing a View's opacity would not be reflected
by hardware layers. This could cause layers to retain their previous
opacity.
Change-Id: Iba2c8b4242deca021651df9324cc7c585a64653d
1. If the application does not accommodate different screen density the
system applies an application scale equal to the device density over
the a default density. The AccessibilityNodeInfo coordinates were not
reported after applying the compatibility scale, therefore the bounds
in parent and screen were not as perceived by the user.
bug:6764586
Change-Id: Id9de3de885210d0725d1f3fde38e769b0cfd12a7
An optimization prunes invalidates on views which are not inside their
parent's bounds. This works in most cases, but it is possible to run
a situation where a view has been invalidated (and is thus waiting to
be redrawn), but the pruning logic ensures that that draw call
will not happen. Further, when/if the view comes into the bounds
of its parent again, it may still not be redrawn, because now future
invalidates on the view are noop'd because it is already in an invalidated
state (and thus will not propagate invalidates up the hierarchy).
The fix is to remove the optitmization. This will cause some overhead
sending the invalidation request up to the view root, but this
overhead is minimal (and only extra for cases of out-of-bounds views),
and the more expensive part of rendering these views will still not be done
since the view root will avoid re-drawing the hierarchy when the dirty
rectangle is empty.
Issue #6773607 Layered views animating from offscreen sometimes remain invisible
Change-Id: Ia2c1a2b9d3e7f267253cb325ccceff1e7fdbe8bd
1. If the application does not accommodate different screen density the
system applies an application scale equal to the device density over
the a default density. The AccessibilityNodeInfo coordinates were not
reported after applying the compatibility scale, therefore the bounds
in parent and screen were not as perceived by the user.
bug:6764586
Change-Id: Iae2d6ea81049364194c7cb09df2240b5eda3d939
