(manifest).
Per discussion with ddougherty@, decided that this was a high-risk,
low-reward change. Have "undone" the change with the given
"Original-Change-Id" as a result.
Bug: 2735276
Change-Id: I1f6089a1319180aed7d6fdbcf182c5fbe4b49abb
Original-Change-Id: Ifa30615c1cca5f6f19e4d1d0c071e4e256b3151b
The description of the "package" attribute for an Android
application's <manifest> element now states more clearly that the
Android package name and the Java package name(s) used in the app's
classes do not need to be the same.
Bug: 2735276
Change-Id: Ifa30615c1cca5f6f19e4d1d0c071e4e256b3151b
The end of the first paragraph of the "Creating a Notification"
section (within the "Notifications" page) now links to the correct
version of notify() -- i.e. the one within the NotificationManager
class.
Bug: 27708810
Change-Id: I7cc9608f646518bf5f7fc3f4a231c9dece693363
Bug: 22767853
- Correct the description about renderscriptTargetApi: Use the lowest
API level providing all the functionality in the code.
- Update the sample gradle config to use the up-to-date and stable
version of Build-Tools.
Change-Id: Ie8008acafb270fda9e2c928953568461f6f6f476
The table listing the different Android API levels (within the
"<uses-sdk>" page) now contains accurate links for "Android 6.0" APIs
and "Platform Highlights."
Bug: 27725763
Change-Id: I7cc9734b84ac530223a6bae58aed0072dcd214aa
Within the "Resource values" sub-section within the "File Conventions"
section of the "App Manifest" page, changed the separator between the
name/value pair for resources and themes such that it is now
consistently a '/' character.
Bug: 27070041
Change-Id: Ie299fbb866b9de3afaffa8fb70e3ca3709c45735
Added a curly brace at the beginning of "onProvideShadowMetrics()."
This method appears within the sample code associated with step 2 of
the "Designing a Drag and Drop Operation" section of the topic.
Bug: 24561657
Change-Id: Icb06a65f63bc57c747bb6f244f6b623c17bdfc45
While checking the manifest for N permissions changes, I saw a
normal permission that had been added in M and not documented.
(The permission was added to AndroidManifest.xml, so it *was*
being listed in the android.Manifest javadoc.)
See first comment for doc stage location.
bug: 27222922
Change-Id: I5740fdb3da3cac37b15d87fe5f092d305c52449d
List of normal permissions had drifted from alphabetical order;
fixed.
See first comment for doc stage location.
Change-Id: I031d1142275c9fd53a2ce16fcd54fdcf206d03a7
Use Thread.sleep instead of Object.wait which simplifies the example.
Also there is a tiny chance, that wait will be called with 0, which
blocks forever.
Change-Id: I4cf90a33089a64bdf802620350f76af08f15f721
(cherry picked from commit 77d8857ed5)
Per bug b/26383626 , the FLASHLIGHT permission was never actually
used, and isn't checked by the new CameraManager.setTorchMode()
method. The permission has been removed from the manifest on
master; there's no reason to list it now in the list of normal
permissions.
See first comment for doc stage location.
bug: 26383626
Change-Id: I0c39dd5e1cdde1fc6a85759663b7e5ad669dc280
Just a missing period; I'll build (see first comment for stage
location) then if it looks good I'll submit.
bug: 26359756
Change-Id: I1f0619f23559abadacccc9a60d19aaf69713a6e2
Fixed a typo and also removed a couple of extra blank lines. I'll
build (to make sure I didn't break anything) then if it looks good
I'll self-+2 and commit.
bug: 26359706
Change-Id: Idc873ad774769819708c3d227d23e676a7fa1a90
Fixed a reported typo (see bug), and while I had the file open, fixed
a few other typos and formatting problems.
I'll go ahead and build and stage this (see first comment for stage
location) to make sure I didn't break anything, but if it looks okay
I'll +2 it myself and submit it.
bug: 26356168
Change-Id: I57727cecd671ab877c0da27e487fa058d95914c5
Doc had said that users have to grant all permissions at install time
(which was misleading--users don't have to grant normal permissions--
and wrong if app and device use runtime permissions).
Changed the text to just say that the user needs to explicitly grant
"these permissions" (the permissions being talked about are all
dangerous), and pointed the reader to the Permissions training class.
I'll build and stage, but since it's a one-sentence fix I'll go ahead
and submit if it looks good.
bug: 25412683
Change-Id: Idc17828f2958d4f8900d29e564c05c54bf3ce753
