As general background, OWNERS files expedite code reviews by helping
code authors quickly find relevant reviewers, and they also ensure
that stakeholders are involved in code changes in their areas.
Some teams under frameworks/base/ have been using OWNERS files
successfully for many years, and we're ready to expand them to cover
more areas. Here's the historical coverage statistics for the last
two years of changes before these new OWNERS changes land:
-- 56% of changes are fully covered by OWNERS
-- 17% of changes are partially covered by OWNERS
-- 25% of changes have no OWNERS coverage
Working closely with team leads, we've now identified clear OWNERS on
a per-package basis, and we're using "include" directives whenever
possible to to simplify future maintenance. With this extensive
effort, we've now improved our coverage as follows:
-- 98% of changes are fully covered by OWNERS
-- 1% of changes are partially covered by OWNERS
-- 1% of changes have no OWNERS coverage
This specific change is automatically generated by a script that
identifies relevant "include" directives.
Bug: 174932174
Test: manual
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: refactoring with team leads buy-in
Merged-In: I3480ddf2fe7ba3dfb922b459d4da01fa17a2c813
Change-Id: I3480ddf2fe7ba3dfb922b459d4da01fa17a2c813
As general background, OWNERS files expedite code reviews by helping
code authors quickly find relevant reviewers, and they also ensure
that stakeholders are involved in code changes in their areas.
Some teams under frameworks/base/ have been using OWNERS files
successfully for many years, and we're ready to expand them to cover
more areas. Here's the historical coverage statistics for the last
two years of changes before these new OWNERS changes land:
-- 56% of changes are fully covered by OWNERS
-- 17% of changes are partially covered by OWNERS
-- 25% of changes have no OWNERS coverage
Working closely with team leads, we've now identified clear OWNERS on
a per-package basis, and we're using "include" directives whenever
possible to to simplify future maintenance. With this extensive
effort, we've now improved our coverage as follows:
-- 98% of changes are fully covered by OWNERS
-- 1% of changes are partially covered by OWNERS
-- 1% of changes have no OWNERS coverage
This specific change is automatically generated by a script from
detailed ownership information confirmed by team leads.
Bug: 174932174
Test: manual
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: refactoring with team leads buy-in
Merged-In: I9789c97c1de8e5d962b48c29c57d82fe83729eba
Change-Id: I9789c97c1de8e5d962b48c29c57d82fe83729eba
Modify the suggestManual...() methods on TimeDetector and
TimeZoneDetector to be synchronous, and have them return true/false to
indicate if the call "succeeded". This is being done before adding more
calls that will be used by apps like SettingsUI; generally all calls
that are user facing and could conceivably fail should return
success/failure information and therefore need to happen synchronously.
Test: atest services/tests/servicestests/src/com/android/server/timedetector/
Test: atest services/tests/servicestests/src/com/android/server/timezonedetector/
Bug: 140712361
Merged-In: I5b6b7fb5af2ffe88392b2ca8d1e8fff2a187521b
Change-Id: I5b6b7fb5af2ffe88392b2ca8d1e8fff2a187521b
Connectivity service is going to become a mainline module which
will not able to access hidden APIs. But it needs
BroadcastOptions#setMaxManifestReceiverApiLevel to restrict the
receiving of CONNECTIVITY_ACTION intent. Thus, expose it as a
system API to support the usage.
Bug: 170593746
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests
Test: atest CtsNetApi23TestCases
Test: atest KeyChainTests
Change-Id: Ic45552174c3f9e74141db4495bb99a582000b574
Merged-In: Ic45552174c3f9e74141db4495bb99a582000b574
This change removes the "pi.append_native_lib_paths" property added as a kill switch for a feature that has been out in the wild now for several releases now.
Change-Id: I21f9d158f60d0cf47e3631bb37ece711b3450494
Merged-In: I21f9d158f60d0cf47e3631bb37ece711b3450494
Fixes: 173103133
(cherry picked from commit 22efaa8422)
@SuppressLint("Doclava125") is a legacy way of suppressing
RequiresPermission check. Updating to the new style of suppression
so metalava no longer has to support the legacy mode.
sed -i "s/@SuppressLint(\"Doclava125/@SuppressLint(\"RequiresPermission/" \
core/java/android/app/admin/DevicePolicyManager.java \
core/java/android/hardware/hdmi/HdmiControlManager.java \
core/java/android/hardware/location/ContextHubManager.java \
core/java/android/hardware/usb/UsbDeviceConnection.java \
core/java/android/net/TrafficStats.java \
core/java/android/os/RecoverySystem.java \
core/java/android/os/storage/StorageManager.java \
core/java/android/service/persistentdata/PersistentDataBlockManager.java \
location/java/android/location/LocationManager.java \
media/java/android/media/AudioManager.java \
telecomm/java/android/telecom/TelecomManager.java \
telephony/java/android/telephony/CarrierConfigManager.java \
telephony/java/android/telephony/TelephonyManager.java \
wifi/java/android/net/wifi/RttManager.java \
wifi/java/android/net/wifi/WifiScanner.java
Test: make
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: No-op change
Merged-In: I6d5df95cfca2950ea86872d2f0afc1ba828841dc
Change-Id: I6d5df95cfca2950ea86872d2f0afc1ba828841dc
Per go/android-owners, include directions should be of the form
[gerrit_project_name]:[absolute_path_to_included_file].
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Only editing OWNERS file that ought
to be owned by ourselves, anyway.
Bug: 159055442
Test: Treehugger
Change-Id: I4238c3b0895819a96ca5ab0151f772ecdde588ff
This is a workaround solution for Android R QPR2. We are not allowed
to change the API for QPR release. This is a special case that allows
the current voice recognizer to note proxy ops if it is also the
voice interactor. In S, we will define a new permission that designed
one as a trusted blamer and tie it to a role.
Bug: 17095434
Test: manual
Test: TreeHugger presubmit
Merged-In: I506bbeb95e622b99693dbf5a135c7961b7fd81c1
Change-Id: I0852d1bb438d25b3e93224a71de1bf3b6df72c1c
This permission is intended to be used internally as a system App Ops permission, and let CompanionDeviceManager or RoleManager to grant with
users. If it is granted by user, the corresponding companion app has the ability to query the details of the ongoing calls, and also manage its life cycle.
Bug: 169595473
Test: atest ThirdPartyInCallServiceAppOpsPermissionTest
Change-Id: Ie0f790aab2edcd52cfdbded2630347b9f8dd4d49
Merged-In: Ie0f790aab2edcd52cfdbded2630347b9f8dd4d49
(cherry picked from commit 334ab546e4)
This permission is intended to be used internally as a system App Ops permission, and let CompanionDeviceManager or RoleManager to grant with
users. If it is granted by user, the corresponding companion app has the ability to query the details of the ongoing calls, and also manage its life cycle.
Bug: 169595473
Test: atest ThirdPartyInCallServiceAppOpsPermissionTest
Change-Id: Ie0f790aab2edcd52cfdbded2630347b9f8dd4d49
Merged-In: Ie0f790aab2edcd52cfdbded2630347b9f8dd4d49