1. The accessibility events for switching a widget were dispatched
before we update the important for accessibility property. We
were lucky to get events in some cases since the pages in the
pager had alpha grater than zero, i.e. the page was already
set as important for accessibility, due to a running animation.
2. Accessibility focus clear event not fired if we give focus to
another view. The old focus was correctly cleared just the
events were not dispatched.
bug:8599670
Change-Id: Ia2647d77eaa4e10fbaf3a047dc9ea5b728f9c3c3
- Wrap all public member variables in getters and make
slots private
- Rename clear* methods to cancel* to be more consistent
with existing public Notification API
Bug: 8656860
Change-Id: I84f7e71fbb627f859352a93089c6a531b44dac95
This allows a listener service to catch up on the current
state of the notification panel at any time, including at
startup.
Bug: 8656860
Change-Id: I1a3d665d84576e17870929a63dda334afc696010
Since the enable touch exploration capability is dynamically granted by
the user for apps targeting pre-JellybeanMR2 API level, we have to properly
update the accessibility service info for that service and also avoid
caching copies of the service info.
bug:8633951
Change-Id: I83dd1c852706ec55d40cda7209ad842889fb970a
A call to ViewGroup.bringChildToFront() or View.bringToFront()
(which delegates to the parent's bringChildToFront() method) needs
to be followed by a call to requestLayout() and invalidate() on the
parent container in order for the changes to
actually happen. That is, the order of the child views would change, but
the parent container would not run layout or even invalidation without
being told to, so there would be no visible change until something else
caused a layout and invalidation to occur.
This change clarifies this requirement in the javadocs.
Issue #8667065 bringtoTop does not work
Change-Id: Ibe41a6318dddf9fb79382e1c9fd1d21ab4510976
1. UiAutomation#executeAndWaitForEvent method was invoking the passed
runnable while holding the lock which may lead to a deadlock. For
example: a runnable that calls getActivity() gets us into a state
like this.
2. UI automation services did not get all capabilities such a
service can have. Now a UI test service gets all of them.
3. When UiAutomation was exiting for event fired as a result of a
performed action, it was checking whether the received evnet time
is strictly before the time of executing the command that should
fire the event. However, if the execution is fast enough, i.e.
less than one millisecond, then the event time and the execution
time are the same. This was leading to a missed signal in rare
cases.
4. AccessibilityNodeInfoCache was not clearing the relevant state
for accessibility focus clearing event.
5. Accessibility text traversal in TextView was partially using text
and partially content description - broken. Now we are using the
text since for text view and content desc for other views. In other
words, we are using the most precise text we have.
6. AccessibilityManagerService was not granting capabilities of a
UiAutomation service - plainly wrong.
CTS change:https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/300693/
bug:8695422
bug:8657560
Change-Id: I9afc5c3c69eb51f1c01930959232f44681b15e86
The fix in:
https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/300346/
worked but the constant used had an extra trailing zero - which was confusing
and put a 1 in the 'flag' space of the measurement spec.
The intended number was:
0x00800000
Unfortunately, this intended constant doesn't fix this bug.
The constant submitted in this fix is:
0x00010000
which is outside the 'flag' space of measurement specs and appears to steer clear of overflow
problems in the scenario of this bug.
As suggested in the submission above, it would be preferable to rework of the RTL code to avoid
the use of such a constant as it seems very unlikely indeed that any choice of integer can
avoid problems in all cases.
Change-Id: I0c6744257ef2aebe8dbc8c041a447f9b90ee4b84
