Revert API behavior changes to SurfaceView, snapping
back to Q's version.
Bug: 133378280
Test: none
Change-Id: I3a47f9bfdfab2d16707f952a9af672551736e681
Parent SurfaceView to a bounds layer that enforces a crop preventing it
from drawing over the surface insets. The bounds layer crop is set to the
surface insets and updated when the parent surface size changes or the
parent surface insets change.
If the SurfaceView children are reparented to another client surface
then ensure the SurfaceView relative layer info is updated correctly.
Bug: 132205507
Test: go/wm-smoke
Test: test preserve surfaces codepath with split screen and ensure relative z is preserved
Test: test surfaceview apps, youtube, maps & camera.
Test: try to repro maps pip issue described in bug
Change-Id: I14c2f7603345ad89f0af4db48150b05d8ada602a
Annotates InputMethodSystemProperty#MULTI_CLIENT_IME_ENABLED as @TestApi
to let cts can verify if multi-client IME enabled.
Bug: 135217809
Test: build and passes
Change-Id: Id7b4dceb2dbfaf3d7ed1084957dd14b04cad0cdf
Allow clients to send SurfaceControl Transactions across processes to
enable more advanced synchronization use cases.
Bug: 132205507
Test: go/wm-smoke
Change-Id: I20a33cafc0960e73f9a2c3d740f81319e02b68ff
... as opposed to strong references.
In case the calls between register and unregister aren't matched, we don't want to be leaking views.
I haven't seen any real eveidence of there being leaks, just a report. But this is preventative.
Created a "WeakSparseArray", which wraps SparseArray, and passes in a kind of WeakReference that has an id.
The references become unreachable, we use the id to remove the the entry from the SparseArray.
Test: Used the device for a bit with talkback on. CTSAccessibility*
Change-Id: I8d11727428f56fc06007232ae341d1409a11991f
Fix: 134506015
In order to get DISPLAY_EVENT_CONFIG_CHANGED, eConfigChangedDispatch needs
to be used when creating DisplayEventDispatcher.
Bug: 131688378
Test: adb shell /data/nativetest64/libsurfaceflinger_unittest/libsurfaceflinger_unittest
Test: trigger config change and observe logcat
Change-Id: I0de8037ee5b024b7d9729750f582be919087be41
failed to launch app resolver when there are more than one app handlers.
What happened:
1. TextClassifier constructs an implicit intent to fulfill a task
like opening a link, making a phone call, etc.
2. TextClassifier calls resolveActivity against the implicit intent to
resolve the intent. The resolve component name will be used to create
an explicit intent. In this case, the intent is resolved to the
app resolver activity.
3. wouldLaunchResolverActivity in SysUI returns false for an explicit
intent with component name android/ResolverActivity.
4. SysUI does not trigger the "start the activity after the keyguard
is gone" logic because wouldLaunchResolverActivity returns false.
5. When user clicks on the action on keyguard, ResolveActivity.onStop
is triggered because it is shown (and thus moved to the background)
under the keyguard. So, finish() is called in onStop, and thus the bug.
IMHO, wouldLaunchResolverActivity should not return false
for an explicit intent with component name android/ResolverActivity.
But since we are late at this point, the safest option is to not setting
component name when the intent is resolved to package "android". Note that
this is what we are doing for P, so it should be pretty safe.
Test: 1. Install two browsers. Send myself a link. Tap on the Open Link
chip on keyguard. App resolver is shown.
2. atest frameworks/base/core/tests/coretests/src/android/view/textclassifier/
BUG: 129220155
Change-Id: I6d4d67c2233a2fec950887ea274825bf1cbc1ae2
