As shown in below, we have already used commit* naming convention in
InputConnection.
- InputConnection#commitCompletion(CompletionInfo);
- InputConnection#commitCorrection(CorrectionInfo);
- InputConnection#commitText(CharSequence, int);
Hence renaming IC#inputContent() to IC#commitContent() would make the
new method more consistent.
Bug: 29450024
Change-Id: Ica1ba3154795c1bf44e140dfe639b299f83cd8af
We might have a pending MSG_RESIZED_REPORT, but if it's executed after
relayoutWindow, mPendingInsets will already be the new value and it'll
not forceLayout. So we need to forceLayout here to make sure the measure
cache is cleared.
bug: 29391054
Change-Id: I73793b1427b89e75700369ec3b37053a6a732f0d
Providing an official protocol for IMEs to insert an image to the
application is something that has been requested from many IME
developers to Android OS. With this CL, IMEs are able to ask
applications to insert a content including image files as follows.
1. An application that opts in to this protocol specifies a list of
supported content MIME types in EditorInfo#contentMimeTypes.
2. When an IME is actively interacting with such an application, the
IME can call InputConnection#insertContent() with a InputContentInfo
that contains content URI, metadata (ClipDescription), and an
optional link URI.
3. The application can read the stream data from the given content URI
to insert the content into somewhere in the application.
Detailed design background can be found in the JavaDoc of
InputConnection#insertContent().
Bug: 22830793
Change-Id: Iaadf934a997ffcd6000a516cc3c1873db56e60ad
Fixes: 29223302
If the surface only changed we want to just call onSurfaceChanged,
not onSurfaceCreated.
Change-Id: I65c8b210a7e34eaa2862020335ee7f6ef56eeac2
Un-reverts ag/1057448, but uses a version of Resources#getText
that returns null rather than throw an exception when no title
is available. This is the same call made before, so this change
should be safer.
Bug: 28744278
Change-Id: I8c123f4f6d74f796ab9e8ffcf955aaf881770da1
At the end of the animation (when going from larger to smaller),
we are left with a scaled surface, that we want to seamlessly
resize to an unscaled surface of the new size. Because we have scaled
the shadow region of the surface, the position of the content
will differ before and after the resize applies. We use new
SurfaceFlinger API to cause position updates to apply after
resize. Because we have to switch into SCALING_MODE_FREEZE,
we could end up prematurely cropping the window, so we
switch to using screen space crop for the pinned stack.
Bug: 28899837
Change-Id: I9b762a237413e4fa3d432e67d30c7125bfef484c
This CL changes the target of VD specific animators to VectorDrawable,
instead of RenderNode. The benefit of doing so is that animators can
now detect whether the animation is meaningful by checking whether
their VD target is in the display list. If not, that means the VD is
not drawing for the current frame, in which case we can be smarter
and more power efficient by removing the animator from the list and
posting a delayed onFinished listener callback.
By setting VD as the animation target, when an ImageView decides to
update its drawable from one AVD to something else, we'll be able
to detect that the previous AVD is no longer in the display list,
and stop providing animation pulse to the stale AVD, which is
something we couldn't do previously. This change also
handles the case where one AVD instance could be drawn in two
different views.
Bug: 27441375
Change-Id: Iaad1ed09cfd526276b95db0dd695275c28e074e8
When calculating scroll amount, we should check whehter focus
is visible using before-scrolling position.
It's possible that the view is already scrolled, then visible
insets changes (eg. IME went away). Previous scroll position
still makes the focus visible, but it will leave the focus
in a bad position when it should be scrolled back.
bug: 29025892
Change-Id: I091f16bebc4c1e5ba831616c51ab2ac75d4c4b3c
am: ddc6de1eda
* commit 'ddc6de1eda495790e6564438994df5d49ddf248f':
Fixed a few accessibility issues with notifications and groups
Change-Id: Ieec9526a2c54edd2f0d3b34973cc61f610f452ae
am: c5fc6c602c
* commit 'c5fc6c602c16f0e985d8f8ba7f94075229e52320':
Close IME when attaching dock stack
Change-Id: I7921bf88bb49134d1fbde752d5fa963786ec1d46
am: e78ba24c17
* commit 'e78ba24c176fd6a0c54eaf7e52be545952ba1ab7':
Update the light center when the root view's layout changed
Change-Id: Ic973b9b47df6550c5170c2248c7e0f2ab25c6a57
am: c396f0f70e
* commit 'c396f0f70ef40ea0fb42a0872a13f4c4e9a6a5f0':
DO NOT MERGE Remove Pointer Capture API
Change-Id: I77cb742feacdd3b8af0cf33d4e7ab246f776417f
am: 39e8022a75
* commit '39e8022a75507be06179c3de7358cebb1bb22e06':
Force pending transactions to flush before screenshot.
Change-Id: Ib8dd84af143226e2b62cdfa51066e68ba7802d28
am: 7c17e70f2f
* commit '7c17e70f2f795ca06006ff2560c8b8211ce1dd52':
Changes based on API council feedback for performContextClick
Change-Id: Ief8c3036b93c28b27ba2f117ec656d38a1562fcf
am: 50c33d1ca1
* commit '50c33d1ca1218ec00eb37f66a7c11315603c9ef7':
Make IMM more robust to spurious window focus-in
Change-Id: I3c80320a5c6711bf3aaeb3043fe54c741c127966
InputMethodManager (IMM) has a latch switch named IMM#mHasBeenInactive
to forcefully refresh IME focus state when an inactive client
(IMM#mActive == false) is gaining window focus. However, it turns out
that there is a race condition where the latch could be unexpectedly
turned off. This is probably what we have been chasing in bug 25373872.
Imagine the following scenario:
1. An app receives MSG_WINDOW_FOCUS_CHANGED w/ hasWindowFocus=false
2. IMM inside the app receives MSG_SET_ACTIVE w/ active=false
3. The app receives MSG_WINDOW_FOCUS_CHANGED w/ hasWindowFocus=true
4. The app receives MSG_WINDOW_FOCUS_CHANGED w/ hasWindowFocus=false
5. The app receives MSG_WINDOW_FOCUS_CHANGED w/ hasWindowFocus=true
Here, our current strategy has been:
A. Turn on the latch when MSG_SET_ACTIVE (w/active=false) is handled.
B. Turn off the latch and ask IMMS to start input when
MSG_WINDOW_FOCUS_CHANGED (w/ hasWindowFocus=true) is handled.
The problem is that in the step B IMMS can reject the request if
WindowManagerService (WMS) tells that the window in question no longer
has window focus. This is not surprising because the app is
just handling messages in the message queue sequentially. As a result,
the IME focus is not updated expectedly in the step 5, because the latch
is no longer enabled as we expected.
With this CL, the latch will be re-enabled if the app fails to start
input while IMM#mActive is false as a short-term solution.
In future we may want to address this issue in protocol level so that
we can address other known issues such as bug 26851566 at the same time.
Bug: 28281870
Change-Id: I60adb38013b063918b074c7b947649eada77b2c8
am: 31e49b0964
* commit '31e49b0964cfba0b6b91e8ae67cbc04730098569':
Children should have backgrounds
Change-Id: I1f68467af9048b93631c33243f4a2dd2e67ccf81
