Bug: 174932174
Test: I solemnly swear I tested this conflict resolution.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: refactoring with team leads buy-in
Change-Id: I9262a08ffc1ccede8e519d0eed90ed2bfcf0232c
As general background, OWNERS files expedite code reviews by helping
code authors quickly find relevant reviewers, and they also ensure
that stakeholders are involved in code changes in their areas.
Some teams under frameworks/base/ have been using OWNERS files
successfully for many years, and we're ready to expand them to cover
more areas. Here's the historical coverage statistics for the last
two years of changes before these new OWNERS changes land:
-- 56% of changes are fully covered by OWNERS
-- 17% of changes are partially covered by OWNERS
-- 25% of changes have no OWNERS coverage
Working closely with team leads, we've now identified clear OWNERS on
a per-package basis, and we're using "include" directives whenever
possible to to simplify future maintenance. With this extensive
effort, we've now improved our coverage as follows:
-- 98% of changes are fully covered by OWNERS
-- 1% of changes are partially covered by OWNERS
-- 1% of changes have no OWNERS coverage
This specific change is automatically generated by a script that
identifies relevant "include" directives.
Bug: 174932174
Test: manual
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: refactoring with team leads buy-in
Merged-In: I3480ddf2fe7ba3dfb922b459d4da01fa17a2c813
Change-Id: I3480ddf2fe7ba3dfb922b459d4da01fa17a2c813
With b/150232615, we will need an explicit value set for the exported
flag when intent filters are present, as the default behavior is
changing for S+. This change adds the value reflecting the previous
default to the manifest.
These changes were made using an automated tool, the xml file may be
reformatted slightly creating a larger diff. The only "real" change is
the addition of "android:exported" to activities, services, and
receivers that have one or more intent-filters.
Bug: 150232615
Test: TH
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: mechanical refactoring
Change-Id: I4457ff2bd466a4c56fed2570e110f251031c2385
See build/soong/README.md for more information.
Note: tests/ImfTest/Android.mk causes conflict as it hasn't been yet
ported to internal master. Do it later.
Note: the conversion in the following directories has to be done in the
internal master first because of the conflicts:
* tests/ActivityManagerPerfTests
* tests/AppLaunch
* tests/AppLaunchWear
* tests/BackgroundDexOptServiceIntegrationTests
* tests/Camera2Tests/CameraToo
* tests/Camera2Tests/SmartCamera/SimpleCamera
* tests/Compatibility
* tests/Internal
* tests/RcsTests
* tests/ServiceCrashTest
* tests/UsbTests
Bug: 122332340
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ie17590c6a96aee5caa80d38092a3de5c1b6efe8d
This change sets LOCAL_SDK_VERSION for all packages where
this is possible without breaking the build, and
LOCAL_PRIVATE_PLATFORM_APIS := true otherwise.
Setting one of these two will be made required soon, and this
is a change in preparation for that. Not setting LOCAL_SDK_VERSION
makes the app implicitly depend on the bootclasspath, which is
often not required. This change effectively makes depending on
private apis opt-in rather than opt-out.
Test: make relevant packages
Bug: 73535841
Change-Id: Ibcffec873a693d1c792ca210fb597d2bf37e9068
Merged-In: I4233b9091d9066c4fa69f3d24aaf367ea500f760
new file: LowStorageTest/AndroidManifest.xml
new file: LowStorageTest/res/layout/main.xml
new file: LowStorageTest/res/values/strings.xml
new file: LowStorageTest/src/com/android/lowstoragetest/LowStorageTest.java
Add the test app which can eat up 100% of the data parition. This is for the low storage test.
new file: LowStorageTest/Android.mk
new file: LowStorageTest/src/com/android/lowstoragetest/LowStorageTest.java
