This reverts commit ba29dbc3b3.
The original commit causes apps such as phone and clock to not wake the
device.
Fixes: 37197491
Change-Id: I1b45cafbcbf12991d8e1e716e4d1751cd077c556
Also:
- Give the session an integer ID as the activityToken is not stable over
restarts of the activity
- Verify that session is only accessed by one UID
- stabilize AccessibilityViewIds over activity lifecycle at least for
the IDs we can do that. This required to split the ID namespace in
"per-app" and "per-activity" views. Only the later ones can be
restored.
- Do not end session when app is killed (as it can be restarted)
Bug: 35484143
Fixes: 36392498
Test: cts-tradefed run cts-dev -m CtsAutoFillServiceTestCases --test=android.autofillservice.cts.SessionLifecycleTest
cts-tradefed run cts-dev -m CtsAutoFillServiceTestCases
Change-Id: I229acc1b3ce35fb57262da7d7466b5d4328b49d4
As far as I can tell this has always been broken. We've always had
intermittent reports of buffer-queue-abandoned as well (a recent bug
came with some reports from N). During onStop SurfaceView relies on
onWindowVisibilityChanged, to trigger a visibility change. At this
point SurfaceView will emit the SurfaceDestroyed callback in order to
stop the client from further use of the Surface. The contract we've
been using with ViewRootImpl is at any point following
Activity.performStop returning the WindowManager was free to destroy
the Surfaces. This is why in setWindowsStopped we destroy the hardware
resources for the ViewRoot. However we aren't dispatching anything to
the SurfaceView. The WindowManager will send an app visibility
notification, but that would go through the handler. This means by the
time we return from Stop, there is no guarantee that the
onWindowVisibilityChanged callbacks have been invoked at all. It
seemed most sensible to dispatch the visibility callbacks directly. We
also ensure that getHostVisibility will return false after this point,
so that performTraversals will not reverse our visibility request if
it occurs again prior to the window visibility notification from the
WindowManager. We also guard against emitting a second window
visibility changed callback in the traversals. I don't know at this
point what value the window visibility notification provides but I
don't feel excited about removing it in this CL at this point in
the development cycle.
Test: Put Chrome in PiP. Turn screen off. No Crash!
Bug: 36561071
Change-Id: Id1673561b2299d477b2761b3ac6afa14eabbf7fb
Fix a bug where a malformed Parceled representation
of an AccessibilityNodeInfo could be used to mess with
Bundles as they get reparceled.
Bug: 36491278
Test: Verified that POC no longer works, a11y cts still passes.
Change-Id: I10f24747e3ab87d77cd1deba56db4526e3aa5441
(cherry picked from commit 687bb44b43)
Fix a bug where a malformed Parceled representation
of an AccessibilityNodeInfo could be used to mess with
Bundles as they get reparceled.
Bug: 36491278
Test: Verified that POC no longer works, a11y cts still passes.
Change-Id: I10f24747e3ab87d77cd1deba56db4526e3aa5441
The default focus highlight should be necessary when the view is
attached to window.
Test: cts-tradefed run singleCommand cts --skip-device-info
--skip-preconditions --abi armeabi-v7a -m CtsViewTestCases -t
android.view.cts.ViewTest
Test: cts-tradefed run singleCommand cts --skip-device-info
--skip-preconditions --abi armeabi-v7a -m CtsWidgetTestCases -t
android.widget.cts.MediaControllerTest
Bug: 37082416
Change-Id: I5d6b0c00b5ba03c8f62e4f71be9336823a73134b
1) Switch AccessibilityButtonChooserActivity to non-exported
2) Update AccessibilityButtonChooserActivity's intent action to
be CTS-compliant
3) Switches to correct permission to validate a click of the
accessibility button originated from the status bar service
Bug: 36866328
Bug: 36976440
Test: Manual / Created app to validate launch protection
Change-Id: Ifcd5e8dbbe683dc99bb900a5870a9ba374fbd5d4
It happened when views provided an Accessibility node that had children.
Bug: 37078783
Fixes: 37009008
Test: LoginActivityTest#testAutoFillWhenViewHasChildAccessibilityNodes
Change-Id: Ie694094afe9129b933096a385eb867baf4550e7f
Also clear this overlay once the data changes. Some views call
notifyValueUpdated even if the value did not change. Hence remeber the
data that was autofilled and check if the data really changed.
Make the autofilledDrawable publicly accessible so that virtual views
can use the same UI.
As the activity is not aware that the views were autofilled the state
has to be explicitly persisted over activity lifecycle events as part
of the view. The lifecyle does not work yet as the AutofillIds are not
stable over activity lifecycle events.
Fixes: 34946006
Test: Autofilled and changed all supported views.
cts-tradefed run cts-dev -m CtsUiRenderingTestCases
Change-Id: I58b105bb221f1b6466dd136dfe5062d3babb5aa8
Moving tests for accessibility manager into the a11y
directory and getting them to use some of the newer
test infrastructure. Minor tweaks to
AccessibilityManager to make it testable.
Deleting the AccessibilityManagerService tests entirely.
This class is difficult to unit test with the current
infrastructure, but is covered in CTS tests to a large
degree. I wasn't able to get these working quickly, and
they rely on timeouts that make them run much slower than
the other tests. They also throw exceptions when their
mock accessibility services receive accessibility events,
which causes the system to blacklist those services, causing
the tests to fail differently until the system is reset.
I think it's better to focus on writing new, more robust
tests than on rewriting these tests to pass.
Bug: 36614219
Test: A11y unit tests now work.
Change-Id: I8effe44f22110d55ebb700dc46f59b7e7a1aa946
(cherry picked from commit 9213d23178)
We need PRIVATE_FLAG_NO_MOVE_ANIMATION to get consistent
results from client initiated window movement in CTS.
Bug: 36865695
Test: Annotations only.
Change-Id: I7850ce3920ba1e89c7759bf9bc25f25731f568a7
In order to clear the measure cache, we need to requestLayout
when updating the child layout params. To see why, consider the case of
a Frame or Linear layout which will measure different heights
depending on the (top/left/right/bottom)Margin parameters of it's
childrens layout params. Now imagine the following sequence of events:
1. We request a layout on the FrameLayout
2. We measure the FrameLayout and place a value in the cache.
3. Now we update the margin parameters on one of the frame layouts
children. Because the parent already has a layout requested
we don't call parent.requestLayout (see View.java#requestLayout),
and thus the parent measure cache isn't cleared.
4. Now we measure the frame layout again and we incorrectly
used the cached value.
Calling to requestLayout when the child layout params
change clears the cache properly. If the child didn't
call request layout from it's own relayout, it must mean that
a layout was already pending (step 1 in the sequence),
and so no more work should be triggered besides clearing the cache.
Bug: 33095565
Bug: 33308065
Bug: 34388764
Test: Manual case in bugs.
Change-Id: I9148f32530588e4dc859297f9658f506b38e72f0
