As CL[1] we introduced WINDOW_FOCUS_GAIN_REPORT_WITH_SAME_EDITOR start
input reason to ignore start new input when the focused view is
same as current served view and the input connection remains the same for
prevent additonal onStartInput / onFinishInput callback to
InputMethodService.
The main idea in the CL is good but how to judge whether the input connection
remains the same is not accurate.
CL[1] only checking if IMM#mServedInputConnectionWrapper self and its
input connection instance is stil exists, that breaks the following cases
to start new input:
Case 1:
- When device screen off / on to go back to focused app, this case will
fit WINDOW_FOCUS_GAIN_REPORT_WITH_SAME_EDITOR use case, so
IMM#mServedInputConnectionWrapper won't be deactivate and clear, this
makes wrong when user taps IME picker dialog to switch IME, will hit
again WINDOW_FOCUS_GAIN_REPORT_WITH_SAME_EDITOR and never start new
input for new IME.
Actually, in InputMethodManager has an ad-hoc check mRestartOnNextWindowFocus
to start new input when device screen off / on case and switching IME,
we should not ignore start input since that will conflict with the above
case.
Case 2:
- As served view is now tracked by ImeFocusController which is per-window
based instance from the IME focus handling refectoring CL[2],
but InputMethodManager instance is still per-display based, so
IMM#mCurrentTextBoxAttribute might be changed when the same app clinet has
multiple IME focusable window focus changed, because focusing to the next
IME focusable window will start new input connection and changes
IMM#mCurrentTextBoxAttribute, so when focusing back to the
original window, the served view in the original window's
ImeFocusController will same as focused view, in that case if we didn't
check if IMM#mCurrentTextBoxAttribute is really aligned with the given
focused view, will mis-judge start new input timing and caused user can't
type because the input connection state is obsoleted.
Those cases can be addessed by using new introduced method
IMM#isSameEditorAndAcceptingText, if the focused view is not aligned
with same editor or the editor is inactive, we should start new input
for Case 2, that also can fix Case 1 that we previously ignored starting
new input when switching IME.
Beside, we also found CL[3] leverages
InputMethodManager#mRestartOnNextWindowFocus to start new input when window focus
changed, since originally this ad-hoc check is only used to re-start input
for Case 1.
As we re-visited the necessary start new input scenerio is only when:
- Device screen off -> on
- Switching IME
- the input connection obsoleted
(this also includes when window focus changed)
As the result, we can remove all unnecessary logics in IMMS
instroduced by CL[1] and remove unnecessary
InputMethodManager#mRestartOnNextWindowFocus from CL[3], and preserve
the behavior is almost same as Q.
[1]: I2da99ae67b9ce4051dec0c0f0e975ebe6e1ab118
[2]: Ib455704fe1e9d243f93190a84f230210dbceac2a
[3]: I8d4fff94ba9313b773bc27fcbd019cc88580d3e9
Fix: 160391516
Bug: 158624922
Bug: 152373385
Test: atest FocusHandlingTest
Test: atest InputMethodServiceLifecycleTest
Test: manual for case 1
0) pre-install 3rd party IME app
1) launch message app and taps Search bar to focus.
2) turn off screen
3) turn on screen to back to focused app
4) press IME switch icon from nav bar
5) choose next IME, expect the IME should be changed.
Test: manual for case 2
0) Sample app with 2 activites, each activity the layout has
EditText
1) Launch activity A, focus EditText
2) Launch activity B and focus EditText
3) Press back key to back to activity A
4) Verify if typing with keyboard is workable.
Change-Id: I1ef3d341af9d473d94d52fd1890deafbae2bc9e1
If the local state and mLastDispatchedState are the same, the logic in
onStateChanged will skip updating the requested state. This could be an
issue, for example, a new focused window requested to hide status bar,
but status bar has already been hidden by the previous focused window,
so the new focused window will never send the requested state to server.
This can easily happen when an immersive activity is re-created due to
the configuration change.
This CL updates the requested state if any visibility within it is not
the same as the requested visibility of the source consumer, while
receiving controls.
Fix: 160854328
Test: atest InsetsControllerTest
Test: Swipe to show transient bars after rotating an immersive activity
Change-Id: I5d9acb1b59252fa80e66070db86b2555764588da
In a normal case, the app will get either a visibility changed to
false or stopped from system server to indicate that the content
should be cleaned up. In those cases, it will request a relayout
to WM, which will notify VRI that the surface is gone. Since the
VRI surface is removed, the SV and bounds layer will get notified
that they should be destroyed. On the next relayout, the VRI will
get a new surface and notify SV and the bounds layer to create
new surfaces.
The scenario in the bug happens when VRI receives a visibility change to
false, but doesn't process the information fast enough. By the time it
calls relayout, WMS is in the state where the client is visible again. This
time the relayout will return a valid surface so the SV and bounds layer
will not get cleaned up. The reason this causes issues is VRI now has a
new main surface. The bounds layer is parented to the old layer that's been
deleted so it's not parented to anything. The SurfaceView is a child of
the bounds layer so it also renders offscreen.
The reparent needs to be done on the client side since WMS won't
reparent the children to the new surface if it thinks the app is
closing. WMS gets the signal that the app is stopping, but on the client
side, it doesn't get stopped since it's restarted quick enough. WMS
doesn't want to keep around old children since they will leak when the
client creates new children.
This change will reparent the bounds layer to the new VRI surface. It's
possible WMS will take care of this in certain cases where the app
isn't stopped. But for those cases, the reparent will not have
any effect since the bounds layer will be correctly parented.
Fixes: 159545768
Test: Can no longer repro black SV in maps
Test: Test app with SV and delay in onPause no longer has the same issue
Change-Id: I616652e1cc4380ebbcb386586d8d5889fcc19497
Fixes a flicker that occurs during transitions between windows.
This happens for two reasons:
1.) Control is immediately transferred to the new window, and the
previous window didn't get a chance to play the animation.
This is addressed by adding logic to keep control on the
exiting window for the duration of the transition - similar to
what we do with the target for z-ordering purposes.
2.) Upon the input connection being severed, the InputMethodService
immediately hides its window, preventing any animations whenever
the input connection changes
This is addressed by moving hiding of the surface into the
controlling windows - where upon receiving control, we now
trigger removal of the IME surface if we don't show it.
Additionally:
- Now ensures that any requests from the ImeInsetsSourceConsumer
ensure that they come from the window that is currently served
by IMM.
- Removes the transparancy clause from isImeTargetFromDisplayContentAndImeSame
to match the updated IME target computation in DisplayContent in [1].
[1]: Iedd5f7407926167f4891ce9b7e9a79e22751e668
Fixes: 153145997
Fixes: 150902448
Test: atest WindowInsetsAnimationControllerTests
Test: atest DisplayContentTests InsetsSourceConsumerTest
Test: Open app with IME, press HOME button, verify IME smoothly animates away
Test: Open Messages, open a thread, open IME. Click search icon, verify IME opens in the search activity
Change-Id: I4910c2a06cc67b0470477b245fc1de54b75f10f9
When config_remoteInsetsControllerControlsSystemBars is true,
DisplaySystemBarsController provides its own policy of how system
bars are displayed for specific packages. Currently limited to
only auto versions of Android.
Bug: 149585273
Test: Manual, atest BarControlPolicyTest, atest InsetsPolicyTest,
atest DisplaySystemBarsControllerTest
Change-Id: Ie6b1cc3e2760cbc9e48d62dfbd8bc3e23ffca20c
Merged-In: Ie6b1cc3e2760cbc9e48d62dfbd8bc3e23ffca20c
When config_remoteInsetsControllerControlsSystemBars is true,
DisplaySystemBarsController provides its own policy of how system
bars are displayed for specific packages. Currently limited to
only auto versions of Android.
Bug: 149585273
Test: Manual, atest BarControlPolicyTest, atest InsetsPolicyTest,
atest DisplaySystemBarsControllerTest
Change-Id: Ie6b1cc3e2760cbc9e48d62dfbd8bc3e23ffca20c
If a requestLayout happens on a child view after the measure
pass, before the layout pass then the child view will not layout.
This can happen if a view calls requestLayout during measure
or during SurfaceView surface destroyed callback.
This fix addresses the second scenario by moving the callback
to after the layout pass.
Bug: 159183008
Test: Repro steps in bug
Test: go/wm-smoke
Change-Id: Ie2794a3751c99cabf6e07445c91159e35eeb1729
Making the A11y event sending to A11y services when a view becomes
invisible if the ancestors of this view are all visible, and this view
becomes invisible from visible.
Bug: 130273130
Test: a11y CTS & unit tests
Change-Id: I836d3e34c7a9cba31843d34922b7ba02a8a062f0
This broke several apps because it means certain NON_FOCUSABLE windows
are now layered wrong w.r.t the IME, and also no longer get IME insets.
Originally, this was introduced because the IME target was used to
compute which window gets control, but this is now computed based on
the window actually connecting to the IME as reported per IMMS.
Reverts I941571c97145d77b0a59d030cf2a8c8318f3b59f.
Bug: 143898978
Bug: 140641950
Bug: 145812508
Bug: 141738570
Bug: 144619551
Fixes: 159438771
Test: atest WindowStateTests
atest FocusHandlingTest
atest WindowManager_LayoutParamsTest
Also manually using steps:
1. Launch gmail compose activity
2. start typing in receipient field
3. verify that even thoug the suggestions popup
window w/ FLAG_NOT_FOCUSABLE becomes the
IME target, control and insets still work.
Change-Id: If451276b1a8c485ec88965d8d30ec8fd3836620f
