Having a hidden abstract method for a class that can be extended
means that public implementors cannot implement these hidden methods
posing a risk that custom implementations will not have required
abstract methods resulting in an exception.
Bug: 151134792
Test: make update-api
Change-Id: I758d12465fabc671be19bedeeceb16885de23c87
Merged-In: I758d12465fabc671be19bedeeceb16885de23c87
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: large scale suppression of existing issues,
no-op in terms of behavior
These are APIs that have @UnsupportedAppUsage but for which we don't
have any evidence of them currently being used, so should be safe to
remove from the unsupported list.
Bug: 170729553
Test: Treehugger
Merged-In: I626caf7c1fe46c5ab1f39c2895b42a34319f771a
Change-Id: I54e5ecd11e76ca1de3c5893e3a98b0108e735413
They can be replaced by the public API provided by ICU4J instead.
No extra layer of caching equivalent to the LocaleData cache is
added because ICU4J has caches instances, e.g. DateFormatSymbols,
etc.
Bug: 160606356
Test: atest FrameworksCoreTests:android.text.format
Change-Id: I07048e0e1a4835d2744b7fce6a5ed79a112e456b
The issue occurs because TextView#isFromPrimePointer assumes multi-touch
events are happening on the same TextView and relies on
ACTION_UP/ACTION_CANCEL to reset the Prime pointer id.
consider following scenario:
1. ACTION_DOWN (pointer 0) landed on ViewA,
ACTION_DOWN (pointer 1) landed on ViewB.
2. ACTION_MOVE landed on both ViewA and ViewB, triggering a drag.
3. When all fingers are released, ACTION_CANCEL (pointer 0) will be
landed on both ViewA and ViewB, so the prime pointer in ViewB is not
reset due to pointer index mismatch.
This CL always reset prime pointer id whenever ACTION_UP/ACTION_CANCEL
is triggered.
Bug: 157399040
Test: manual
Change-Id: Id35d9eac939378482fa50e85bb5cda58469240ad
The methods can be implemented with ICU4J directly.
Bug: 160606356
Test: atest android.text.format.DateFormatTest
Test: atest CtsTextTestCases:android.text.format.cts.DateFormatTest
Change-Id: I3d5f639a94026c599b487563c95bf9d165adfeec
When user types some text and then long presses on end of empty area
to open context menu, if user opens Gboard and selects text from the
reverse direction, SelectionEnd will be less than SelectionStart. The
IllegalArgumentException occurred because TextClassification does not
allow SelectionEnd is less than SelectionStart. We swap the start and
end index if end index is less than start index.
Bug: 150916165
Bug: 157452302
Test: Manual. No crash occurs.
Test: atest FrameworksCoreTests:android.widget.TextViewActivityTest
(cherry picked from commit cb3c97db0c)
Merged-In: I8dbc92f0f31e64b7e3a45ae91762e1b741629a8e
Change-Id: Ie0e2b5840e147f98174cae4521eb777e1a080706
Creating a new Throwable (and filling in the stack trace) can take
up to 150us. Since we do this on the critical path when sending
over SurfaceControl via binder multiple times, this is too much.
Instead, add an option to pass in callsite manually.
Bug: 159056748
Change-Id: I46c339c15a07192d61c4c546e46f260684a47120
Merged-In: I46c339c15a07192d61c4c546e46f260684a47120
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Large scale refactor
SurfaceView doesn't respect the visibility of its ancestor so we need to
update it accordingly inside InlineContentView.
Test: manually
Bug: 158714351
Change-Id: If482747d6ae5d7628b46de837c11b6232406120c
When an inline content view is reparented its surface is
getting offset and not being under the view itelf. This is
because the surface views manage the postion of their
surface and are assuming a location based off the window's
surface position. However after a reparenting the inline
content view's surface position becomes relative to that
of the new parent surface view. For example, two surface
views at position (10, 10) being reparented would reslut
in the surface of the parent being at (10, 10) while the
surface of the child being at (20, 20) while both views
would still be at (10, 10).
To address this we are intecepting when an inline content
view's surface is reparented and get a weak reference to
the view that owns the new parent surface. We then position
the inline content view's surface relative to the view that
owns the new parent surface, i.e. we position the surface
such that its location would not change because of the
fact it is being reparented.
While at this make sure the inline content view is marked
as not important for a11y to ernsure the a11y plugins don't
try to click on the view tree in the app's process but
insted on the views in the remote proccess, i.e. on the
embedded view tree.
bug:153826463
Test: atest android.widget.cts.inline.InlineContentViewTest#testReparenting
Change-Id: I2cff4b88d404a740bc447668e948eabccad084d2
This restores the logic removed from SelectionModifierCursorController
in ag/9994946. A quick sequence of "tap", "drag", "tap" events (such
as when quickly scrolling a small input field) should *not* be treated
as a double-tap.
Bug: 158948887
Test: Manual and unit tests
atest FrameworksCoreTests:EditorTouchStateTest
atest FrameworksCoreTests:EditorCursorDragTest
Change-Id: I9fb9cb06b1e208946566a0f70697c62ee7684ca0
Support clipping for InlineContentView's backing surface
to enable suggestions clipping that does not require re-
parenting which has side effects.
bug:153826463
Test: atest android.widget.cts.inline.InlineContentViewTest#testReparenting
Change-Id: Ia2988ebd660323bf65f0141b4b542a9c4320e178
- In Android Auto, android.widget.cts.ToastTest#testShow_whenTextToast_sendsAccessibilityEvent failed is failed, since AccessibilityManager in ToastPresenter is initialized with the wrong userId.
- ToastUI creates the Context from the uid of the received message, so we can get the correct userId from the Context.
Bug: 154644563
Test: atest android.widget.cts29.ToastTest android.widget.cts.ToastTest
android.server.wm.ToastWindowTest ToastUITest
NotificationManagerServiceTest LegacyToastTest
Change-Id: I138620a0a52e65429157719f588c4be56b075368
SurfaceView doesn't respect its ancestor's visibility change, so we need
a OnPreDrawListener listener to update it according to visibility change
in the view hierarchy.
Bug: 158714351
Test: verified locally
Change-Id: I7d6a7db48e037ed7d4ec2ecb23a158e8d1c43240
* The NPE is due to in the InlineContentView we try to reparent the
surface view which is no longer attached to the window, this can
happen if the InlineContentView is attached to window and then
immediately detached from the window, before the surface package
is returned from the remote view process.
* Release the surface package immediately in this case, so the
remote view can be released.
Test: atest android.autofillservice.cts.inline
Bug: 158139090
Change-Id: I9efdf8ba182a1d66334362edcfb6ba58fcdc222a
Magnifier#mDestroyLock was introduced by below change:
Idf0373ab0d5033d56da0f6f45d7d953f7e796813
Then related code was removed by below change:
Ia4c75b5b997e0ed94d5a3814dd4507a8fffa124d
With this change, Magnifier#mDestroyLock becomes redundant,
useless lock.
This change intends to remove this redundant lock.
Change-Id: Ifa3f83f8953a3d992e26a952d9ac2f3343b0dc9e
Signed-off-by: jiajia tang <tangjiajia@xiaomi.com>
Symptom:
Media volume bar shows non-zero value even during the mute state.
Root cause:
A request for updating progress of ProgressBar has 2 kind of updating
ways, animated and non-animated. If a non-animated request is invoked
before completing an animated request, the visual progress can be
overwritten by the old animated request. As a result, the visual
progress value becomes different from the actual value.
Solution:
A running animation on the primary progress should be canceled
before handling a new non-animated request.
Bug: 148759348
Test: atest CtsWidgetTestCases:ProgressBarTest
Merged-In: I569dbea4c6346ecfff8141d8378b4952fb1fa530
Change-Id: I569dbea4c6346ecfff8141d8378b4952fb1fa530
(cherry picked from commit 589552766c)
Symptom:
Media volume bar shows non-zero value even during the mute state.
Root cause:
A request for updating progress of ProgressBar has 2 kind of updating
ways, animated and non-animated. If a non-animated request is invoked
before completing an animated request, the visual progress can be
overwritten by the old animated request. As a result, the visual
progress value becomes different from the actual value.
Solution:
A running animation on the primary progress should be canceled
before handling a new non-animated request.
Bug: 148759348
Test: atest CtsWidgetTestCases:ProgressBarTest
Change-Id: I569dbea4c6346ecfff8141d8378b4952fb1fa530
Merged-In: I569dbea4c6346ecfff8141d8378b4952fb1fa530
This CL reverts ag/10267783 effectively.
ag/10267783 makes tab key insert \t character on multiline text fields,
however, it broke the existing apps which depends on the previous
behavior.
Bug: 154290658
Test: manual - Tab key on multiline text fields advance focus
Test: atest TextViewTest#testKeyNavigation
Change-Id: I9836ce29321ca789bce6636514ce9a8dbf923ada
* Before this change, when the inline suggestion view is detached from
the IME window (e.g. due to layout change), the remote view content
will not show again even after the view is reattached to the window
on the IME side. This patch fixes it by requesting the remote view
owner (the ext services) for a new SurfacePackage when the view is
re-attached to the window (see javadoc of SurfaceControlViewHost for
why this works).
* This patch also fixes the issue where the SurfaceControlViewHost was
never released in the ext services. This is done by notifying the
ext services (through system server) when the view is detached from
the IME window, and then the system server will release the
SurfaceControlViewHost if after N(=500) ms the view is not re-attached
to a window.
* After the SurfaceControlViewHost is released, if the view is
re-attached to the window later, a new SurfaceControlViewHost will be
created to back the same InlineContentView.
* The current code structure also lays a foundation for a subsequent
change to allow reusing the same remote view for inline suggestions
during filtering.
Test: atest CtsAutofillServiceTestCases (sanity test)
Bug: 153615023
Bug: 154683107
Change-Id: Idc587e1e82a96b792c351796464821b7aad7cd89
These were previously being suppressed by doclava but with this change,
all failures are fixed and the suppression logic has been removed.
To fix the issues, there were a few possible changes made:
- broken reference to a public API (such as incorrect parameters): fixed
- unnecessary @link inside an @see tag: fixed
- @see referring to an @hide or @SystemApi: reference removed
- broken references to inner class constructors
- worked around by fully qualifying the constructor
Bug: 6963924
Test: make doc-comment-check-docs
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-picked from master
Change-Id: Ifbdce2de96cdffa560bd90f549fa7184d1f9af85
Merged-In: Ifbdce2de96cdffa560bd90f549fa7184d1f9af85
(cherry picked from commit e0624c7a40)
