This helps reduce some of the artifacts shown in areas the app isn't
drawing content when resizing using the docked divider.
Bug: 24507122
Change-Id: I08a2c3ccd5cb5366c8278f62a5808b12ca09154d
It is possible for an external process (e.g. sys-ui) to call into
WM to get the bounds of a stack in between the construction of the
DisplayContent object and SystemServer telling WM that the display
is ready. Incorrect bounds would be returned to the caller in this
case since the baseDisplayWidth/Height is only set when the displayReady
call is made.
We now initialize the base display information when the DisplayContent
object is created so any call to get the logical display rect of the
display will always return the right bounds. This should be okay as the
display manager is initialized way before window manager.
Bug: 24505761
Change-Id: Iebd688ad8f4c08556846fcebb543e58bd2c01414
When a docked stack exist we resize all other stacks and crop their
window content to the stack size. This was also been done when the
docked stack exist, but not visible. E.g the primary user has a docked
stack, but the secondary user doesn't, so the windows of the secondary
user get cropped.
We now report stacks/task sizes as fullscreen whenever the docked stack
isn't visible.
Bug: 24366804
Change-Id: Ia3f24e6f7d33fc175348e27db24a15ce3027e6f7
In a new split system user model, owner of a restricted profile is not limited
to just user0. restrictedProfileParentId field should be used to get an owner.
Bug: 22950929
Change-Id: I928319a9450e543972237a42267eb2404e117c83
Also moved restricted profile create/setup logic from Settings to
UMS.createRestrictedProfile.
Bug: 24212155
Bug: 24303609
Change-Id: I0346a3368de53f4bb4b6e054349f19adac959d7f
The only time AppWindowToken.willBeHidden is used is for determining
if the app should contribute to calculating orientation. In the same
check AppWindowToken.hiddenRequested will be or-ed with willBeHiden,
so it's enough that hiddenRequested to be set.
The only place where willBeHidden is set, is right before
WMS.setAppVisibility is called, which will set hiddenRequested.
Because of this willBeHidden is unnecessary.
Change-Id: Iea35f39f72e7f0dcd76205ef580f3a74cac72d08
Instead of the JIT only being available for eng builds [or configurable
via environment variable], allow the JIT to be enabled programatically.
Change-Id: Ifcbc8445fb8bd45ce2bfed3f80fbaf48496f8e3a
It was because UserManager.get() returns a static cached instance but
we should always be using the mock instance that's created for each test.
Bug 24378326
Change-Id: Id4663e7676d2d0130622055a97fbde0884714349
