From 6f828594219850624d71e258fac2ec43c8ae40f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Riddle Hsu Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 23:46:19 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Check physical upside down for seamless rotation The "UpsideDown" field of DisplayRotation stands for reverse portrait. So the general up side down rotation should be ROTATION_180. Also move up the condition of movable navigation bar, which should have higher priority to allow seamless rotation. Because it also means that upside down is supported. Fixes: 229671538 Test: atest DisplayRotationTests#testShouldRotateSeamlessly Change-Id: I9165f44b42fd058cb52753ecdf3cb98789c675d2 --- .../com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotation.java | 14 +++++++------- .../android/server/wm/DisplayRotationTests.java | 8 +++++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotation.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotation.java index 43ff58083657e..d73eff1c1c113 100644 --- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotation.java +++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotation.java @@ -702,17 +702,17 @@ public class DisplayRotation { } boolean canRotateSeamlessly(int oldRotation, int newRotation) { + // If the navigation bar can't change sides, then it will jump when we change orientations + // and we don't rotate seamlessly - unless that is allowed, eg. with gesture navigation + // where the navbar is low-profile enough that this isn't very noticeable. + if (mAllowSeamlessRotationDespiteNavBarMoving || mDisplayPolicy.navigationBarCanMove()) { + return true; + } // For the upside down rotation we don't rotate seamlessly as the navigation bar moves // position. Note most apps (using orientation:sensor or user as opposed to fullSensor) // will not enter the reverse portrait orientation, so actually the orientation won't change // at all. - if (oldRotation == mUpsideDownRotation || newRotation == mUpsideDownRotation) { - return false; - } - // If the navigation bar can't change sides, then it will jump when we change orientations - // and we don't rotate seamlessly - unless that is allowed, eg. with gesture navigation - // where the navbar is low-profile enough that this isn't very noticeable. - return mAllowSeamlessRotationDespiteNavBarMoving || mDisplayPolicy.navigationBarCanMove(); + return oldRotation != Surface.ROTATION_180 && newRotation != Surface.ROTATION_180; } void markForSeamlessRotation(WindowState w, boolean seamlesslyRotated) { diff --git a/services/tests/wmtests/src/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotationTests.java b/services/tests/wmtests/src/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotationTests.java index 25cff61c3b785..e8d0acba5e522 100644 --- a/services/tests/wmtests/src/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotationTests.java +++ b/services/tests/wmtests/src/com/android/server/wm/DisplayRotationTests.java @@ -721,14 +721,20 @@ public class DisplayRotationTests { doReturn(true).when(mMockDisplayPolicy).navigationBarCanMove(); doReturn(win).when(mMockDisplayPolicy).getTopFullscreenOpaqueWindow(); mMockDisplayContent.mCurrentFocus = win; - mTarget.mUpsideDownRotation = Surface.ROTATION_180; + // This should not affect the condition of shouldRotateSeamlessly. + mTarget.mUpsideDownRotation = Surface.ROTATION_90; doReturn(true).when(win.mActivityRecord).matchParentBounds(); // The focused fullscreen opaque window without override bounds should be able to be // rotated seamlessly. assertTrue(mTarget.shouldRotateSeamlessly( Surface.ROTATION_0, Surface.ROTATION_90, false /* forceUpdate */)); + // Reject any 180 degree because non-movable navbar will be placed in a different position. + doReturn(false).when(mMockDisplayPolicy).navigationBarCanMove(); + assertFalse(mTarget.shouldRotateSeamlessly( + Surface.ROTATION_90, Surface.ROTATION_180, false /* forceUpdate */)); + doReturn(true).when(mMockDisplayPolicy).navigationBarCanMove(); doReturn(false).when(win.mActivityRecord).matchParentBounds(); // No seamless rotation if the window may be positioned with offset after rotation. assertFalse(mTarget.shouldRotateSeamlessly(