Merge "Avoid lock inversion." into qt-qpr1-dev
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Android (Google) Code Review
commit
f63047c04b
@@ -773,9 +773,9 @@ public class BatterySaverStateMachine {
|
||||
|
||||
// Handle triggering the notification to show/hide when appropriate
|
||||
if (intReason == BatterySaverController.REASON_DYNAMIC_POWER_SAVINGS_AUTOMATIC_ON) {
|
||||
runOnBgThread(this::triggerDynamicModeNotification);
|
||||
triggerDynamicModeNotification();
|
||||
} else if (!enable) {
|
||||
runOnBgThread(this::hideDynamicModeNotification);
|
||||
hideDynamicModeNotification();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (DEBUG) {
|
||||
@@ -787,33 +787,42 @@ public class BatterySaverStateMachine {
|
||||
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
void triggerDynamicModeNotification() {
|
||||
NotificationManager manager = mContext.getSystemService(NotificationManager.class);
|
||||
ensureNotificationChannelExists(manager, DYNAMIC_MODE_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
R.string.dynamic_mode_notification_channel_name);
|
||||
// The current lock is the PowerManager lock, which sits very low in the service lock
|
||||
// hierarchy. We shouldn't call out to NotificationManager with the PowerManager lock.
|
||||
runOnBgThread(() -> {
|
||||
NotificationManager manager = mContext.getSystemService(NotificationManager.class);
|
||||
ensureNotificationChannelExists(manager, DYNAMIC_MODE_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
R.string.dynamic_mode_notification_channel_name);
|
||||
|
||||
manager.notifyAsUser(TAG, DYNAMIC_MODE_NOTIFICATION_ID,
|
||||
buildNotification(DYNAMIC_MODE_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
mContext.getResources().getString(R.string.dynamic_mode_notification_title),
|
||||
R.string.dynamic_mode_notification_summary,
|
||||
Intent.ACTION_POWER_USAGE_SUMMARY),
|
||||
UserHandle.ALL);
|
||||
manager.notifyAsUser(TAG, DYNAMIC_MODE_NOTIFICATION_ID,
|
||||
buildNotification(DYNAMIC_MODE_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
mContext.getResources().getString(
|
||||
R.string.dynamic_mode_notification_title),
|
||||
R.string.dynamic_mode_notification_summary,
|
||||
Intent.ACTION_POWER_USAGE_SUMMARY),
|
||||
UserHandle.ALL);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
void triggerStickyDisabledNotification() {
|
||||
NotificationManager manager = mContext.getSystemService(NotificationManager.class);
|
||||
ensureNotificationChannelExists(manager, BATTERY_SAVER_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
R.string.battery_saver_notification_channel_name);
|
||||
// The current lock is the PowerManager lock, which sits very low in the service lock
|
||||
// hierarchy. We shouldn't call out to NotificationManager with the PowerManager lock.
|
||||
runOnBgThread(() -> {
|
||||
NotificationManager manager = mContext.getSystemService(NotificationManager.class);
|
||||
ensureNotificationChannelExists(manager, BATTERY_SAVER_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
R.string.battery_saver_notification_channel_name);
|
||||
|
||||
final String percentage = NumberFormat.getPercentInstance()
|
||||
.format((double) mBatteryLevel / 100.0);
|
||||
manager.notifyAsUser(TAG, STICKY_AUTO_DISABLED_NOTIFICATION_ID,
|
||||
buildNotification(BATTERY_SAVER_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
mContext.getResources().getString(
|
||||
R.string.battery_saver_charged_notification_title, percentage),
|
||||
R.string.battery_saver_off_notification_summary,
|
||||
Settings.ACTION_BATTERY_SAVER_SETTINGS),
|
||||
UserHandle.ALL);
|
||||
final String percentage = NumberFormat.getPercentInstance()
|
||||
.format((double) mBatteryLevel / 100.0);
|
||||
manager.notifyAsUser(TAG, STICKY_AUTO_DISABLED_NOTIFICATION_ID,
|
||||
buildNotification(BATTERY_SAVER_NOTIF_CHANNEL_ID,
|
||||
mContext.getResources().getString(
|
||||
R.string.battery_saver_charged_notification_title, percentage),
|
||||
R.string.battery_saver_off_notification_summary,
|
||||
Settings.ACTION_BATTERY_SAVER_SETTINGS),
|
||||
UserHandle.ALL);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void ensureNotificationChannelExists(NotificationManager manager,
|
||||
@@ -854,8 +863,12 @@ public class BatterySaverStateMachine {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void hideNotification(int notificationId) {
|
||||
NotificationManager manager = mContext.getSystemService(NotificationManager.class);
|
||||
manager.cancel(notificationId);
|
||||
// The current lock is the PowerManager lock, which sits very low in the service lock
|
||||
// hierarchy. We shouldn't call out to NotificationManager with the PowerManager lock.
|
||||
runOnBgThread(() -> {
|
||||
NotificationManager manager = mContext.getSystemService(NotificationManager.class);
|
||||
manager.cancelAsUser(TAG, notificationId, UserHandle.ALL);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void setStickyActive(boolean active) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user