ContactsContract: Adding joined columns to the Data class definition.
The rationale is this. Since all these joined columns are currently on
different classes, we routinely see code like this:
private static final String[] PROJECTION_PHONE = {
Data._ID, // 0
RawContacts.CONTACT_ID, // 1
Phone.TYPE, // 2
Phone.NUMBER, // 3
Phone.LABEL, // 4
Contacts.DISPLAY_NAME, // 5
};
The most noxious line is RawContacts.CONTACT_ID
After this change, the above declaration changes to:
private static final String[] PROJECTION_PHONE = {
Data._ID, // 0
Data.CONTACT_ID, // 1
Phone.TYPE, // 2
Phone.NUMBER, // 3
Phone.LABEL, // 4
Data.DISPLAY_NAME, // 5
};
Change-Id: I03bfc700e4c8c58a175bc885bf7b807d7fed0744
This commit is contained in:
@@ -682,7 +682,8 @@ public final class ContactsContract {
|
|||||||
* definition and some generic columns. Each data type can define the meaning for each of
|
* definition and some generic columns. Each data type can define the meaning for each of
|
||||||
* the generic columns.
|
* the generic columns.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
public static final class Data implements BaseColumns, DataColumns {
|
public static final class Data implements BaseColumns, DataColumns, RawContactsColumns,
|
||||||
|
ContactsColumns {
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* This utility class cannot be instantiated
|
* This utility class cannot be instantiated
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user