Merge "Fix IPMS tests timeout." am: 1f9d80f6ee
am: 618ff5185a
Change-Id: Ie8d1934205810586812714e5a63f10dc5fa01841
This commit is contained in:
@@ -202,9 +202,11 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
|
||||
functor.accept(latch);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
latch.await(5000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
|
||||
if (!latch.await(5000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)) {
|
||||
fail(timeoutMessage);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
|
||||
fail(timeoutMessage);
|
||||
fail("Thread was interrupted");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -314,6 +316,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertEquals(Status.ERROR_ILLEGAL_ARGUMENT, status.resultCode);
|
||||
assertNull(key);
|
||||
assertNull(attr);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -383,6 +386,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(FAKE_KEYS[5], key);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
|
||||
// MTU matches key 4 but v4 address matches key 5. The latter is stronger.
|
||||
@@ -392,6 +396,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(FAKE_KEYS[5], key);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
|
||||
// Closest to key 3 (indeed, identical)
|
||||
@@ -402,6 +407,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(FAKE_KEYS[3], key);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
|
||||
// Group hint alone must not be strong enough to override the rest
|
||||
@@ -411,6 +417,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(FAKE_KEYS[3], key);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
|
||||
// Still closest to key 3, though confidence is lower
|
||||
@@ -421,6 +428,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(FAKE_KEYS[3], key);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
|
||||
// But changing the MTU makes this closer to key 4
|
||||
@@ -430,6 +438,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(FAKE_KEYS[4], key);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
|
||||
// MTU alone not strong enough to make this group-close
|
||||
@@ -441,6 +450,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertNull(key);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -450,6 +460,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
assertTrue("Retrieve network sameness not successful : " + status.resultCode,
|
||||
status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(sameness, answer.getNetworkSameness());
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -488,6 +499,7 @@ public class IpMemoryStoreServiceTest {
|
||||
+ status.resultCode, status.isSuccess());
|
||||
assertEquals(Status.ERROR_ILLEGAL_ARGUMENT, status.resultCode);
|
||||
assertNull(answer);
|
||||
latch.countDown();
|
||||
})));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user