From 6f13f73b7332a86adb61dd23a725d36e5a9537d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Sharkey Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:33:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] DO NOT MERGE. No direct Uri grants from system. The system should never be extending Uri permission grants from itself, since it automatically holds all the permissions. Instead, the system should always be a mediator between two specific app, and it should be using startActivityAsCaller() if it needs to extend permissions. Blocking at this level fixes an entire class of confused deputy security issues. Test: builds, normal intent resolution UI works Bug: 33019296, 32990341, 32879915, 32879772 Change-Id: Iaa57c393a386d8068e807d0dd0caccc89d8a11db --- .../java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java index 5805fb356b838..6bb1ebfae5e3b 100755 --- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java +++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityManagerService.java @@ -7239,7 +7239,12 @@ public final class ActivityManagerService extends ActivityManagerNative // Third... does the caller itself have permission to access // this uri? - if (UserHandle.getAppId(callingUid) != Process.SYSTEM_UID) { + final int callingAppId = UserHandle.getAppId(callingUid); + if ((callingAppId == Process.SYSTEM_UID) || (callingAppId == Process.ROOT_UID)) { + Slog.w(TAG, "For security reasons, the system cannot issue a Uri permission" + + " grant to " + grantUri + "; use startActivityAsCaller() instead"); + return -1; + } else { if (!checkHoldingPermissionsLocked(pm, pi, grantUri, callingUid, modeFlags)) { // Require they hold a strong enough Uri permission if (!checkUriPermissionLocked(grantUri, callingUid, modeFlags)) {