Improve OWNERS coverage across frameworks/base/. am: 061c2ec3b6

Original change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/frameworks/base/+/1519382

MUST ONLY BE SUBMITTED BY AUTOMERGER

Change-Id: I1218107820d89a570b55768ed6f9b223cd0db5fc

OWNERS

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# This top-level list should remain narrowly defined as team leads; individual
+# teams are strongly encouraged to define narrower OWNERS files at deeper
+# levels within the source tree; see OWNERS.md for more details
+dsandler@android.com
+dsandler@google.com
+hackbod@android.com
+hackbod@google.com
+jsharkey@android.com
+jsharkey@google.com
+michaelwr@google.com
+nandana@google.com
+narayan@google.com
+ogunwale@google.com
+svetoslavganov@android.com
+svetoslavganov@google.com
+yamasani@google.com
+
+# Support bulk translation updates
+per-file */res*/values*/*.xml = byi@google.com

OWNERS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+As general background, `OWNERS` files expedite code reviews by helping code
+authors quickly find relevant reviewers, and they also ensure that stakeholders
+are involved in code changes in their areas.
+
+The structure of `frameworks/base/` is unique among Android repositories, and
+it's evolved into a complex interleaved structure over the years.  Because of
+this structure, the best place to authoritatively define `OWNERS` can vary
+wildly, but here are some common patterns:
+
+* `core/java/` contains source that is included in the base classpath, and as
+such it's where most APIs are defined:
+  * `core/java/android/app/`
+  * `core/java/android/content/`
+* `services/core/` contains most system services, and these directories
+typically have more granularity than `core/java/`, since they can be refactored
+without API changes:
+  * `services/core/java/com/android/server/net/`
+  * `services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/`
+* `services/` contains several system services that have been isolated from the
+main `services/core/` project:
+  * `services/appwidget/`
+  * `services/midi/`
+* `apex/` contains Mainline modules:
+  * `apex/jobscheduler/`
+  * `apex/permission/`
+* Finally, some teams may have dedicated top-level directories:
+  * `media/`
+  * `wifi/`
+
+Area maintainers are strongly encouraged to list people in a single
+authoritative `OWNERS` file in **exactly one** location.  Then, other paths
+should reference that single authoritative `OWNERS` file using an include
+directive.  This approach ensures that updates are applied consistently across
+the tree, reducing maintenance burden.

ZYGOTE_OWNERS

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+calin@google.com
+chriswailes@google.com
+maco@google.com
+narayan@google.com
+ngeoffray@google.com

core/api/OWNERS

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# API changes are managed via Prolog rules, not OWNERS
+*

core/res/OWNERS

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+adamp@google.com
+alanv@google.com
+dsandler@android.com
+dsandler@google.com
+hackbod@android.com
+hackbod@google.com
+jsharkey@android.com
+jsharkey@google.com
+michaelwr@google.com
+nandana@google.com
+narayan@google.com
+ogunwale@google.com
+patb@google.com
+svetoslavganov@android.com
+svetoslavganov@google.com
+toddke@google.com
+yamasani@google.com

data/etc/OWNERS

@@ -1 +1,13 @@
-per-file privapp-permissions-platform.xml = hackbod@android.com, jsharkey@android.com, svetoslavganov@google.com, toddke@google.com, yamasani@google.com, cbrubaker@google.com, jeffv@google.com, moltmann@google.com, lorenzo@google.com
+cbrubaker@google.com
+hackbod@android.com
+hackbod@google.com
+jeffv@google.com
+jsharkey@android.com
+jsharkey@google.com
+lorenzo@google.com
+moltmann@google.com
+svetoslavganov@android.com
+svetoslavganov@google.com
+toddke@android.com
+toddke@google.com
+yamasani@google.com

services/api/OWNERS

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# API changes are managed via Prolog rules, not OWNERS
+*