From 90819feb5a868a69ab1d296994e9128f8e07ad80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Makoto Onuki <omakoto@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:58:08 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] *ServiceStartNotAllowedException shouldn't have a "cause"

Bug: 210890426
Test: Manual test with a test app, received this exception and
made sure cause isn't set.
Merged-in: I94ba39c775cf95074907db6814104289a577d496
(cherry picked from commit d4396b9a9d699b2b7c8029d024af912198207f68)
(cherry picked from commit 34af3074f2e0bb1b42fcdd39e295411dba514be2)
Merged-In: I94ba39c775cf95074907db6814104289a577d496
Change-Id: I94ba39c775cf95074907db6814104289a577d496
---
 core/java/android/app/ServiceStartNotAllowedException.java | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/core/java/android/app/ServiceStartNotAllowedException.java b/core/java/android/app/ServiceStartNotAllowedException.java
index 33285b2190eb5..b1f47eee4bfd7 100644
--- a/core/java/android/app/ServiceStartNotAllowedException.java
+++ b/core/java/android/app/ServiceStartNotAllowedException.java
@@ -40,4 +40,11 @@ public abstract class ServiceStartNotAllowedException extends IllegalStateExcept
             return new BackgroundServiceStartNotAllowedException(message);
         }
     }
+
+    @Override
+    public synchronized Throwable getCause() {
+        // "Cause" is often used for clustering exceptions, and developers don't want to have it
+        // for this exception. b/210890426
+        return null;
+    }
 }