Merge "Query PlatformCompat for targetSdk check in AndroidPackageParsingTestBase" into rvc-dev am: b6eaf6ed79 am: 3f628376ea

Change-Id: Ifbfc876e8f909b4ad8176c7afedbc0fbec68bc78
This commit is contained in:
Winson Chiu
2020-04-03 04:05:36 +00:00
committed by Automerger Merge Worker
3 changed files with 80 additions and 26 deletions

View File

@@ -322,7 +322,12 @@ public class ParsingPackageImpl implements ParsingPackage, Parcelable {
private String className;
private int compatibleWidthLimitDp;
private int descriptionRes;
private boolean enabled;
// Usually there's code to set this to true during parsing, but it's possible to install an APK
// targeting <R that doesn't contain an <application> tag. That code would be skipped and never
// assign this, so initialize this to true for those cases.
private boolean enabled = true;
private boolean crossProfile;
private int fullBackupContent;
private int iconRes;

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ package com.android.server.pm.parsing
import android.content.pm.PackageManager
import android.platform.test.annotations.Presubmit
import com.google.common.truth.Expect
import com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertWithMessage
import org.junit.Rule
import org.junit.Test
/**
@@ -28,6 +30,9 @@ import org.junit.Test
@Presubmit
class AndroidPackageParsingEquivalenceTest : AndroidPackageParsingTestBase() {
@get:Rule
val expect = Expect.create()
@Test
fun applicationInfoEquality() {
val flags = PackageManager.GET_META_DATA or PackageManager.GET_SHARED_LIBRARY_FILES
@@ -41,7 +46,8 @@ class AndroidPackageParsingEquivalenceTest : AndroidPackageParsingTestBase() {
} else {
"$firstName | $secondName"
}
assertWithMessage(packageName).that(it.first?.dumpToString())
expect.withMessage("${it.first?.sourceDir} $packageName")
.that(it.first?.dumpToString())
.isEqualTo(it.second?.dumpToString())
}
}
@@ -71,7 +77,8 @@ class AndroidPackageParsingEquivalenceTest : AndroidPackageParsingTestBase() {
} else {
"$firstName | $secondName"
}
assertWithMessage(packageName).that(it.first?.dumpToString())
expect.withMessage("${it.first?.applicationInfo?.sourceDir} $packageName")
.that(it.first?.dumpToString())
.isEqualTo(it.second?.dumpToString())
}
}

View File

@@ -29,14 +29,17 @@ import android.content.pm.PermissionInfo
import android.content.pm.ProviderInfo
import android.os.Debug
import android.os.Environment
import android.os.ServiceManager
import android.util.SparseArray
import androidx.test.platform.app.InstrumentationRegistry
import com.android.internal.compat.IPlatformCompat
import com.android.server.pm.PackageManagerService
import com.android.server.pm.PackageSetting
import com.android.server.pm.parsing.pkg.AndroidPackage
import com.android.server.pm.pkg.PackageStateUnserialized
import com.android.server.testutils.mockThrowOnUnmocked
import com.android.server.testutils.whenever
import org.junit.After
import org.junit.BeforeClass
import org.mockito.Mockito
import org.mockito.Mockito.anyInt
@@ -59,7 +62,27 @@ open class AndroidPackageParsingTestBase {
setCallback { false /* hasFeature */ }
}
protected val packageParser2 = TestPackageParser2()
private val platformCompat = IPlatformCompat.Stub
.asInterface(ServiceManager.getService(Context.PLATFORM_COMPAT_SERVICE))
protected val packageParser2 = PackageParser2(null /* separateProcesses */,
false /* onlyCoreApps */, context.resources.displayMetrics, null /* cacheDir */,
object : PackageParser2.Callback() {
override fun isChangeEnabled(
changeId: Long,
appInfo: ApplicationInfo
): Boolean {
// This test queries PlatformCompat because prebuilts in the tree
// may not be updated to be compliant with the latest enforcement checks.
return platformCompat.isChangeEnabled(changeId, appInfo)
}
// Assume the device doesn't support anything. This will affect permission
// parsing and will force <uses-permission/> declarations to include all
// requiredNotFeature permissions and exclude all requiredFeature permissions.
// This mirrors the old behavior.
override fun hasFeature(feature: String) = false
})
/**
* It would be difficult to mock all possibilities, so just use the APKs on device.
@@ -91,35 +114,31 @@ open class AndroidPackageParsingTestBase {
lateinit var newPackages: List<AndroidPackage>
var failureInBeforeClass: Throwable? = null
private val thrownInSetUp = mutableListOf<Throwable>()
@Suppress("ConstantConditionIf")
@JvmStatic
@BeforeClass
fun setUpPackages() {
failureInBeforeClass = null
try {
this.oldPackages = apks.map {
this.oldPackages = apks.mapNotNull {
tryOrNull {
packageParser.parsePackage(it, PackageParser.PARSE_IS_SYSTEM_DIR, false)
}
}
this.newPackages = apks.map {
this.newPackages = apks.mapNotNull {
tryOrNull {
packageParser2.parsePackage(it, PackageParser.PARSE_IS_SYSTEM_DIR, false)
}
}
if (DUMP_HPROF_TO_EXTERNAL) {
System.gc()
Environment.getExternalStorageDirectory()
.resolve(
"${AndroidPackageParsingTestBase::class.java.simpleName}.hprof")
.absolutePath
.run(Debug::dumpHprofData)
}
} catch (t: Throwable) {
// If we crash here we cause a tool failure (because we don't run any of the tests
// in the subclasses, leading to a difference between expected and actual test
// result counts).
failureInBeforeClass = t
if (DUMP_HPROF_TO_EXTERNAL) {
System.gc()
Environment.getExternalStorageDirectory()
.resolve(
"${AndroidPackageParsingTestBase::class.java.simpleName}.hprof")
.absolutePath
.run(Debug::dumpHprofData)
}
}
@@ -146,13 +165,36 @@ open class AndroidPackageParsingTestBase {
this.pkg = aPkg
whenever(pkgState) { PackageStateUnserialized() }
}
private fun <T> tryOrNull(block: () -> T) = try {
block()
} catch (t: Throwable) {
thrownInSetUp.add(t)
null
}
}
@org.junit.Before
@After
fun verifySetUpPackages() {
failureInBeforeClass?.let {
throw AssertionError("setUpPackages failed:", it)
}
if (thrownInSetUp.isEmpty()) return
val exception = AssertionError("setUpPackages failed with ${thrownInSetUp.size} errors:\n" +
thrownInSetUp.joinToString(separator = "\n") { it.message.orEmpty() })
/*
Testing infrastructure doesn't currently support errors thrown in @AfterClass,
so instead it's thrown here. But to avoid throwing a massive repeated stack for every
test method, only throw on the first method run in the class, clearing the list so that
subsequent methods can run without failing. Doing this in @After lets true method
failures propagate, as those should throw before this does.
This will cause the failure to be attached to a different method depending on run order,
which could make comparisons difficult. So if a failure points here, it's worth
checking failures for all methods in all subclasses.
TODO: When infrastructure supports @AfterClass errors, move this
*/
thrownInSetUp.clear()
throw exception
}
// The following methods dump an exact set of fields from the object to compare, because