Merge "Fix for requestLayout-during-layout inefficiencies"
This commit is contained in:
@@ -15509,17 +15509,27 @@ public class View implements Drawable.Callback, KeyEvent.Callback,
|
||||
* handle possible request-during-layout errors correctly.</p>
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void requestLayout() {
|
||||
ViewRootImpl viewRoot = getViewRootImpl();
|
||||
if (viewRoot != null && viewRoot.isInLayout()) {
|
||||
viewRoot.requestLayoutDuringLayout(this);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (mAttachInfo != null && mAttachInfo.mViewRequestingLayout == null) {
|
||||
// Only trigger request-during-layout logic if this is the view requesting it,
|
||||
// not the views in its parent hierarchy
|
||||
ViewRootImpl viewRoot = getViewRootImpl();
|
||||
if (viewRoot != null && viewRoot.isInLayout()) {
|
||||
if (!viewRoot.requestLayoutDuringLayout(this)) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
mAttachInfo.mViewRequestingLayout = this;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT;
|
||||
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_INVALIDATED;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mParent != null && !mParent.isLayoutRequested()) {
|
||||
mParent.requestLayout();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (mAttachInfo != null && mAttachInfo.mViewRequestingLayout == this) {
|
||||
mAttachInfo.mViewRequestingLayout = null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -17999,6 +18009,12 @@ public class View implements Drawable.Callback, KeyEvent.Callback,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
final Point mPoint = new Point();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Used to track which View originated a requestLayout() call, used when
|
||||
* requestLayout() is called during layout.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
View mViewRequestingLayout;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Creates a new set of attachment information with the specified
|
||||
* events handler and thread.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1894,22 +1894,37 @@ public final class ViewRootImpl implements ViewParent,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Called by {@link android.view.View#requestLayout()} if the view hiearchy is currently
|
||||
* undergoing a layout pass. requestLayout() should not be called during layout, but if it
|
||||
* is called anyway, we handle the situation here rather than leave the hierarchy in an
|
||||
* indeterminate state. The solution is to queue up all requests during layout, apply those
|
||||
* requests as soon as layout is complete, and then run layout once more immediately. If
|
||||
* Called by {@link android.view.View#requestLayout()} if the view hierarchy is currently
|
||||
* undergoing a layout pass. requestLayout() should not generally be called during layout,
|
||||
* unless the container hierarchy knows what it is doing (i.e., it is fine as long as
|
||||
* all children in that container hierarchy are measured and laid out at the end of the layout
|
||||
* pass for that container). If requestLayout() is called anyway, we handle it correctly
|
||||
* by registering all requesters during a frame as it proceeds. At the end of the frame,
|
||||
* we check all of those views to see if any still have pending layout requests, which
|
||||
* indicates that they were not correctly handled by their container hierarchy. If that is
|
||||
* the case, we clear all such flags in the tree, to remove the buggy flag state that leads
|
||||
* to blank containers, and force a second request/measure/layout pass in this frame. If
|
||||
* more requestLayout() calls are received during that second layout pass, we post those
|
||||
* requests to the next frame, to avoid possible infinite loops.
|
||||
* requests to the next frame to avoid possible infinite loops.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>The return value from this method indicates whether the request should proceed
|
||||
* (if it is a request during the first layout pass) or should be skipped and posted to the
|
||||
* next frame (if it is a request during the second layout pass).</p>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param view the view that requested the layout.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return true if request should proceed, false otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void requestLayoutDuringLayout(final View view) {
|
||||
boolean requestLayoutDuringLayout(final View view) {
|
||||
if (view.mParent == null || view.mAttachInfo == null) {
|
||||
// Would not normally trigger another layout, so just let it pass through as usual
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!mHandlingLayoutInLayoutRequest) {
|
||||
if (!mLayoutRequesters.contains(view)) {
|
||||
Log.w("View", "requestLayout() called by " + view + " during layout pass");
|
||||
mLayoutRequesters.add(view);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Log.w("View", "requestLayout() called by " + view + " during second layout pass: " +
|
||||
"posting to next frame");
|
||||
@@ -1919,6 +1934,7 @@ public final class ViewRootImpl implements ViewParent,
|
||||
view.requestLayout();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1937,20 +1953,66 @@ public final class ViewRootImpl implements ViewParent,
|
||||
Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_VIEW, "layout");
|
||||
try {
|
||||
host.layout(0, 0, host.getMeasuredWidth(), host.getMeasuredHeight());
|
||||
|
||||
mInLayout = false;
|
||||
int numViewsRequestingLayout = mLayoutRequesters.size();
|
||||
if (numViewsRequestingLayout > 0) {
|
||||
// requestLayout() was called during layout: unusual, but try to handle correctly
|
||||
mHandlingLayoutInLayoutRequest = true;
|
||||
// requestLayout() was called during layout.
|
||||
// If no layout-request flags are set on the requesting views, there is no problem.
|
||||
// If some requests are still pending, then we need to clear those flags and do
|
||||
// a full request/measure/layout pass to handle this situation.
|
||||
|
||||
// Check state of layout flags for all requesters
|
||||
ArrayList<View> mValidLayoutRequesters = null;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < numViewsRequestingLayout; ++i) {
|
||||
mLayoutRequesters.get(i).requestLayout();
|
||||
View view = mLayoutRequesters.get(i);
|
||||
if ((view.mPrivateFlags & View.PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT) == View.PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT) {
|
||||
while (view != null && view.mAttachInfo != null && view.mParent != null &&
|
||||
(view.mPrivateFlags & View.PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT) != 0) {
|
||||
if ((view.mViewFlags & View.VISIBILITY_MASK) != View.GONE) {
|
||||
// Only trigger new requests for non-GONE views
|
||||
Log.w(TAG, "requestLayout() improperly called during " +
|
||||
"layout: running second layout pass for " + view);
|
||||
if (mValidLayoutRequesters == null) {
|
||||
mValidLayoutRequesters = new ArrayList<View>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
mValidLayoutRequesters.add(view);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (view.mParent instanceof View) {
|
||||
view = (View) view.mParent;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
view = null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (mValidLayoutRequesters != null) {
|
||||
// Clear flags throughout hierarchy, walking up from each flagged requester
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < numViewsRequestingLayout; ++i) {
|
||||
View view = mLayoutRequesters.get(i);
|
||||
while (view != null &&
|
||||
(view.mPrivateFlags & View.PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT) != 0) {
|
||||
view.mPrivateFlags &= ~View.PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT;
|
||||
if (view.mParent instanceof View) {
|
||||
view = (View) view.mParent;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
view = null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Process fresh layout requests, then measure and layout
|
||||
mHandlingLayoutInLayoutRequest = true;
|
||||
int numValidRequests = mValidLayoutRequesters.size();
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < numValidRequests; ++i) {
|
||||
mValidLayoutRequesters.get(i).requestLayout();
|
||||
}
|
||||
measureHierarchy(host, lp, mView.getContext().getResources(),
|
||||
desiredWindowWidth, desiredWindowHeight);
|
||||
mInLayout = true;
|
||||
host.layout(0, 0, host.getMeasuredWidth(), host.getMeasuredHeight());
|
||||
mHandlingLayoutInLayoutRequest = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
measureHierarchy(host, lp, mView.getContext().getResources(),
|
||||
desiredWindowWidth, desiredWindowHeight);
|
||||
// Now run layout one more time
|
||||
mInLayout = true;
|
||||
host.layout(0, 0, host.getMeasuredWidth(), host.getMeasuredHeight());
|
||||
mHandlingLayoutInLayoutRequest = false;
|
||||
mLayoutRequesters.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user