Android/frameworks_base
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge "Fix unminimizing dock stack for AppTask.moveToFront" into nyc-dev

Browse Source 
am: 6321f42fbe

* commit '6321f42fbee425745de9636d45e4973fa6c470b9':
  Fix unminimizing dock stack for AppTask.moveToFront

Change-Id: I82b844611cb1761a681f91e2e26b25308202c6da
This commit is contained in:
Jorim Jaggi
2016-06-02 22:19:12 +00:00
committed by android-build-merger
parent 84c074adb2 6321f42fbe
commit 02082ad631
2 changed files with 20 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityStackSupervisor.java
View File

@@ -4404,6 +4404,12 @@ public final class ActivityStackSupervisor implements DisplayListener {
"startActivityFromRecentsInner: Task " + taskId + " not found.");
}
// Since we don't have an actual source record here, we assume that the currently focused
// activity was the source.
final ActivityStack focusedStack = getFocusedStack();
final ActivityRecord sourceRecord =
focusedStack != null ? focusedStack.topActivity() : null;
if (launchStackId != INVALID_STACK_ID) {
if (task.stack.mStackId != launchStackId) {
moveTaskToStackLocked(
@@ -4428,6 +4434,11 @@ public final class ActivityStackSupervisor implements DisplayListener {
if (launchStackId == DOCKED_STACK_ID) {
setResizingDuringAnimation(taskId);
}
mService.mActivityStarter.postStartActivityUncheckedProcessing(task.getTopActivity(),
ActivityManager.START_TASK_TO_FRONT,
sourceRecord != null ? sourceRecord.task.stack.mStackId : INVALID_STACK_ID,
sourceRecord, task.stack);
return ActivityManager.START_TASK_TO_FRONT;
}
callingUid = task.mCallingUid;

16
services/core/java/com/android/server/am/ActivityStarter.java
View File

@@ -540,12 +540,13 @@ class ActivityStarter {
} finally {
mService.mWindowManager.continueSurfaceLayout();
}
postStartActivityUncheckedProcessing(r, err, stack.mStackId);
postStartActivityUncheckedProcessing(r, err, stack.mStackId, mSourceRecord, mTargetStack);
return err;
}
void postStartActivityUncheckedProcessing(
ActivityRecord r, int result, int prevFocusedStackId) {
ActivityRecord r, int result, int prevFocusedStackId, ActivityRecord sourceRecord,
ActivityStack targetStack) {
if (result < START_SUCCESS) {
// If someone asked to have the keyguard dismissed on the next activity start,
@@ -559,7 +560,7 @@ class ActivityStarter {
if (r.task != null && r.task.stack != null) {
startedActivityStackId = r.task.stack.mStackId;
} else if (mTargetStack != null) {
startedActivityStackId = mTargetStack.mStackId;
startedActivityStackId = targetStack.mStackId;
}
// If we launched the activity from a no display activity that was launched from the home
@@ -567,9 +568,9 @@ class ActivityStarter {
// noDisplay activity will be finished shortly after.
// TODO: We should prevent noDisplay activities from affecting task/stack ordering and
// visibility instead of using this flag.
final boolean noDisplayActivityOverHome = mSourceRecord != null
&& mSourceRecord.noDisplay
&& mSourceRecord.task.getTaskToReturnTo() == HOME_ACTIVITY_TYPE;
final boolean noDisplayActivityOverHome = sourceRecord != null
&& sourceRecord.noDisplay
&& sourceRecord.task.getTaskToReturnTo() == HOME_ACTIVITY_TYPE;
if (startedActivityStackId == DOCKED_STACK_ID
&& (prevFocusedStackId == HOME_STACK_ID || noDisplayActivityOverHome)) {
final ActivityStack homeStack = mSupervisor.getStack(HOME_STACK_ID);
@@ -1811,7 +1812,8 @@ class ActivityStarter {
final int result = startActivityUnchecked(
pal.r, pal.sourceRecord, null, null, pal.startFlags, resume, null, null);
postStartActivityUncheckedProcessing(
pal.r, result, mSupervisor.mFocusedStack.mStackId);
pal.r, result, mSupervisor.mFocusedStack.mStackId, mSourceRecord,
mTargetStack);
} catch (Exception e) {
Slog.e(TAG, "Exception during pending activity launch pal=" + pal, e);
pal.sendErrorResult(e.getMessage());